Blogs

  • EVENT ANNOUNCEMENT: Paris is Burning at the Frida with Maggie Mae Fish

    So excited to guest host a screening of one of my favorite films at @cinespia the day after my birthday! I hope those of you in LA can join me! You can get tickets at https://thefridacinema.org/movies/paris-is-burning-hosted-by-maggie-mae-fish-qa-w-kat-blaque/

  • Blue Panties and Bourbon: The TikTok Saga That Reveals The Underground of Closeted Married Men Who Meet Each Other For Sex

    Recently, I published a video about Blue Panties and Bourbon, a series of videos that Brandi Hammond is uploading on TikTok. In the series, she reads through her deceased husband’s emails, which reveal quite a bit of infidelity with men, women, and apparently “boys”. Brandi had no idea that her husband, David, had been trolling the internet for 8 of the 17 years of their marriage, seeking sex primarily with other married men. At some point, she discovered that he was even stealing her panties, wearing them, and even loaning them out to men. Soon, she even discovered that he had been taking photos of her without her consent and trading and sharing them with men. In some emails, he was David, a married man unsatisfied with his wife, trying to find a mutually beneficial situation with a man who enjoyed seeing him in panties. In other emails, he was Michael, a smooth bull who pleased wives and couples. And occasionally, he pretended to be his wife, eagerly curious about sex with a younger, athletic man who could please her in a way her husband could not. Despite doing this for at least 8 years, as far as she knows, he often described himself as inexperienced with men. As Brandi reads through some of these emails, it becomes clear that many of them went nowhere, but she later discovers he did indeed meet up with several men and even snuck them into the home she owned. Brandi wouldn’t discover any of this until she could one day access his laptop, where she found several emails that she later forwarded to herself. Now, she sits on TikTok reading all of the dirty details, hoping to feel some relief from what was clearly a very traumatic and upsetting thing for her to discover about the man she’d been with for so long. As a former Craigslist rat, I found this story fascinating in many ways, and I wanted to expand on some of my thoughts after publishing a video about the series on my YouTube channel. Since filming that video, I have a bit of additional context I also wanted to add to my coverage.

    I questioned whether this was a story I should highlight, but I decided to because I often feel like situations like this aren’t really discussed. Growing up, I interacted with a lot of men like David. Men who were cheating on their wives, often maintaining multiple personas online and frequently deciding that their wives didn’t need to know what was going on. I find that we have a very hard time having frank conversations about men like this because, on one hand, we want to entertain the premise that our homophobic society necessitates that some men with queer desires remain closeted. I know from many of my interactions with these men that many of them have something akin to an addiction when it comes to both meeting up with these men and having these conversations. It’s a habit that is very hard for them to drop, and they get off on the secrecy of it. At some point, David pushed Brandi to try some of the things he fantasized about, but she really had no interest in any of it. Sex for her has an added layer of anxiety, as she lives with a seminal plasma allergy, which makes her allergic to sperm. While she suspected that something may have been up, she didn’t know that he had been welcoming men into their home, where they were able to leave seminal fluid on her towels, bedding, and more. For years, she complained about her allergic reactions and the suspicion that she had an allergy to semen, but her male doctor would dismiss the possibility. Reading through his emails, she found that her husband had a particular fetish for cum, and no doubt, many of the allergic reactions she’d been struggling with for multiple years were the result of her being exposed, without her knowledge, to the semen of some of the men he was cheating on her with. David was certainly aware of this allergy, but he didn’t seem to care how it affected his wife. This is a constant throughline of these messages, and part of why I want to talk about this story is that this intentional cruelty is often dismissed and, in some cases, even defended.

    A text post seeking a safe playmate, outlining preferences for physical attributes, personality traits, and relationship dynamics, with a focus on safety and privacy.
    David’s very first Doublist Ad

    Brandi would ask David if he wanted an open relationship, and he’d affirm that he very much did not. When she started to suspect something was up, David would not only deny the possibility of him cheating, but would often dismiss her as hysterical. She would likely have continued to believe that was possible unless she read the messages he sent to men. In recent discourse around bisexual men, it’s often been asserted that cisgender heterosexual women do not do enough to make bisexual men feel comfortable and affirmed enough to be honest about who they are attracted to. While it is indeed biphobic to assume that a bisexual man is a cheater, I’d be lying if I told you that I haven’t known a large chunk of men who see their bisexuality as something they intend to hide forever from their cisgender heterosexual partners whom they plan to marry and gain social capital from. Brandi was David’s third wife, and at 67, she begged him for years to take out his Social Security so he could start contributing financially again. The house was hers, but money was getting tighter, and his Social Security wasn’t increasing. However, he knew that if he took that money, it would quickly go to the children he had with his second wife. Children who needed financial support that he had avoided giving them for years. Being broke on paper worked in his favor. He had no place to go, and if you ask Brandi, the marriage should have ended six years ago, but they had a wellness business together, and after 17 years, it’s hard to turn your back on a person you once loved.

    Every Thursday, Brandi would visit a friend outside Columbia, South Carolina. This became the primary day when he would sneak men into their home. Crossdressing was a major theme of many of his encounters. David often wanted to take on what he described as the “feminine role,” as a verse bottom, and many of his Doublelist posts were of him seeking a dominant male who would “breed” him. He would steal Brandi’s panties and photograph himself in them, and send those photos to men who often got off on seeing a masculine man in his wife’s panties. As he started to lose his hair, it went to his lower body, creeping down his back and forming a distinct tuft on his lower back. Quite frequently, he’d ask Brandi to help him shave his back and his bottom, and then he’d write later in his emails to the men he was cheating with that he was a “totally smooth bottom”.

    While going through the emails, he found that he was actively taking nude photos of her and trading them with other men. There’s an entire subculture of this online. In some of the emails Brandi reads, you do get the very distinct impression that quite often, David was speaking to men who, similar to David, were pretending to be women, often masquerading as curious wives seeking sex with younger, muscular men. Some of the oldest emails she found were from Craigslist, where he frequently offered himself as a “bull.” A bull within this context is a man with a certain degree of sexual prowess who enters into a dynamic with a couple, usually with the intention of satisfying the wife. Sharing and trading photos of wives is central to many of these interactions, but most of his emails involving images of his wife or other wives do not end with him meeting up with a couple. In fact, many of them left the back door open for the possibility of these men interacting with each other, and fizzled out when the other man clearly didn’t seem interested.

    While David was in his 60s, he’d often tell people he was in his 40s, sometimes 50s, and in his 20s when he pretended to be a young man eagerly seeking out couples. What stood out to me about many of his messages was how incredibly verbose they were. Many of them went into almost fan-fiction levels of description, where he’d write in much detail about who he was, his background, where he came from, and even claiming to be in various branches of the military. He would string together these little pieces of his real identity and warp them into a new character for almost every new person he spoke to. His penis would either grow or drop a half inch depending on who he would talk to, and the entire time, he’d been struggling with ED and, according to Brandi, remained very quiet during sex. He spent much more time forming deep, transparent intimacy with the men he met up with. In many of his emails, he often spoke of being able to find the passion that was missing in his relationship with his wife in a sexual relationship with the men he met online, and most of his posts on Doublelist or Craigslist stressed that he was looking for a long-term connection with one particular person. Many of the messages had the theme of wanting to be, specifically, with other married people; not just because of the mutually assured destruction aspect that would keep the relationship private, but as an explicit fetish. When he would give his wife’s panties to men, he’d also steal some of her Chanel perfume and spray the panties with it. The idea was that it would suggest her, as he put it, “married pussy”. These men didn’t just enjoy exchanging photos of their wives; they explicitly wanted photos of a “married,” and presumably “owned,” woman. There is an incredible subtext of misogyny woven through not only his messages, but also his choices.

    Brandi and David

    Some people have been disappointed with my mention of the recent discourse around bisexual men in this context, but to me, this story does partially feel relevant. Yes, this cheating man does not, and certainly does not, represent all or even most bisexual men. However, this story is a good example of a tangible, real thing that many women are trying to avoid when they say they do not want to date a bisexual man. I think that there needs to be a conversation with those women about how men like the one in this story are men who get off on dishonesty, and that while his sex with men may indeed be shocking, his sexuality isn’t as relevant as the explicit enjoyment he clearly received from being deceptive. David would hide her panties underneath the hood of their cars, so that he could sneak into the driveway and give oral sex to men in the wee hours of the morning. This apparently kept the dogs up all night barking and kept her up, but each morning, he’d greet her with the question, “How was your sleep?” As Brandi read through the messages, it became clearer to her just how much he seemed to get off on torturing her by doing things that were indeed abusive. He gaslit her for multiple years about the truth of his infidelity and was allowed to open the marriage and communicate clearly and honestly about his interactions with other people. Still, he did not want to do that. He preferred sneaking around, being dishonest, and exposing her to things that she didn’t consent to. This has nothing to do with his sexuality or his crossdressing habit.

    I wrote about this before, in the context of Sam Rockwell’s monologue in The White Lotus, where his character speaks about crossdressing and shifting sexual roles. Crossdressing is not inherently fetishistic, and many people do it as self-expression or just because they like to. Still, there is a segment of men for whom femininity is only appealing on them when they’re being degraded. For some men, crossdressing fetishism can be a manifestation of sexualized misogyny. Some men view women as inherently degraded and degradable beings, and they conflate femininity and feminine gender expression with degradation and sexual submission. In one of her videos, Brandi speaks about a queer relative of theirs whom David was apparently quite cruel towards. It seems like David, in his daily life, was quite homophobic despite what he was up to behind the scenes. This is not at all uncommon among men who crossdress. Many of the men I’ve known who were crossdressers were indeed conservative men who held onto these very binary ideas of gender roles and expectations. They partially crossdressed because they could not justify the idea of being submissive without also being feminized and thus degraded. In some of the emails, David desires the role of the feminine bottom; in others, he desires the role of the dominant top, often seeking a younger man who also crossdresses. As I’ve discussed a few times, I’ve often found autogynophilia as an idea to be mostly entirely laughable and untrue. Still, I do see a version of that among crossdressers, who do often enjoy creating sexy tableaux for each other to get off to. It’s not uncommon for these men to move freely between these roles, but I’ve noticed they often make a point of creating completely distinct personas for these pursuits, which we see in some of David’s emails.

    In my life as a sex positive person who is within several kink-positive spaces where most of the things David is curious about are pursued openly and without shame, it makes me a bit sad that some people feel like wasting another person’s time is excusable. What frustrates me a lot in these conversations is that women like Brandi are often attacked for speaking out and are accused of being homophobic or otherwise closed-minded, largely because they don’t accept being cheated on. While I can understand why some people look at Brandi and immediately assume that she isn’t an inclusive person, the sense I’ve gotten from her videos is she very much is, and that most of her frustration with this is not that he was with men, but the fact that he lied to her and gaslit her so much through their relationship that it was clear that he absolutely never wanted her to know. As I said, I’ve met more than a few men who feel like the women in their lives don’t deserve any clarity about who they’re dating. There are indeed people who believe there’s no reason to tell your wife of 17 years the truth about your sexuality, especially in a monogamous relationship, and people who downplay the actual impact of infidelity. I feel the need to remind people that you can do all of these things openly and still have a wife who fully accepts you. Some of my personal friends are cis women who are dating bi men, and they will often even look for men for their husbands to have sex with.

    Last year, I went to Bisexual Fuck Fest, which was a swinger event full of married bisexual men who openly and clearly communicated their desires with their wives. There, I was able to connect with a full range of married swingers who celebrated a man’s sexual fluidity. There was a version of this where he could get every layer of what he wanted with his wife’s full communication and support, but he didn’t really want that. The people who’d say he was hiding all of this because of homophobia may have a point. Still, ultimately, there’s a version of this where his wife wouldn’t have to wait until he gets a brain tumor and dies to find out that he’d been forming deep, continued relationships with men for almost a decade, likely longer. Many of the closeted men I spoke to in my youth blamed the cis women in their lives for why they weren’t open about what they were doing, and, paying attention to them, you always got the sense that this complaint didn’t exist independently of their misogyny. These men often resent women, and their resentment of them comes out in their paraphilias, where women are degraded and given very little choice. Brandi would discover that for quite some years, sometimes on those Thursday nights, David would keep a thumb drive full of some of the photos he took of her unconsensually; he’d tape it to the back of a TV in the guestroom, and he’d regularly invite men over and orally service them while a slideshow of her photos played. At no point would it have mattered if she was open-minded and accepting. He actively enjoyed the deception and the gaslighting and had no intention of ever communicating about what he was doing.

    David is one of many men who recognize that in a society where homophobia thrives, there is an incentive to seem heterosexual and remain married. Thousands of men are not closeted because the women they’re with won’t accept them, or simply out of self-preservation. There is indeed a subset of men who cheat on their wives because it’s exciting, not because their wives are too closed-minded. David’s sexuality was a secret he kept through their entire relationship. However, at the end of the day, the fact that he was cheating with men, while shocking, is almost irrelevant. I’ve known many men like David, and I know that while they live with a certain degree of homophobia that causes them to be incredibly self-destructive, they also often live with a particular strain of misogyny. A misogyny where the women in their lives exist as props that are useful to them, where they are expected to stand by them regardless. There is immense misogyny in deciding that the woman who’s legally bound to you is yours to trade freely without her consent. David decided time and time again that her boundaries not only didn’t matter, but were worth negating if it turned other men on. He used her for his fetish, and even after being presented with the option of opening up the relationship, he decided that he preferred sneaking around over being open and honest. He needed a place to stay and access to a bank account without his name that his ex-wives couldn’t access. He had to die for her to find out the truth, and in the end, Brandi is left to put the pieces of her life back together. There is an incredibly misogynistic expectation for women in Brandi’s position to remain silent and deal with it alone so that they can protect the image of a man who was, in fact, abusing them. I’m very glad Brandi has found support online and connected with a community of women who have gone through the same things. I hope she continues to share her story so other women in similar situations know they are not alone.

  • Reader Response: How To Support Trans Women When They First Come Out

    I’m sorry that it’s taken me so long to get back to these, but we’re getting back on point! This week, I got a very simple, but very heavy question from a reader who hails all the way from Norway!

    Dear Reader,

    Firstly, I appreciate that you’re reaching out to me for perspective, especially as a younger person. It means so much that you are thinking empathetically about how to support those around you better and feel particularly passionate about supporting your transgender partner. Initially, I hesitated to respond to this particular inquiry, but as I sat on it, I realized that I actually had quite a bit to say:

    Understanding Closeted Life

    For transgender women who’ve been in the closet, the decision to come out isn’t simple. If they told you, but no one else, they likely trust you and hold your opinion of them in high regard. It can be incredibly scary to come out, and so frequently we are rejected when we do. Most trans people are the most delicate and sensitive during the era where they first come out, and as their partner, I would certainly anticipate that things will shift within your relationship, but that doesn’t mean it will end.

    When I was a closeted teenager, I didn’t really tell many people the truth about who I actually was. I was an isolated child who didn’t really have very many friends, and I didn’t want many friends because I knew they’d eventually figure out that I was weird (read: trans). I had two best friends with whom I didn’t really have conversations about my gender until I’d already started transitioning. Back then, I was living a double life: who my parents wanted me to be at home, and who I wanted to be when I ran away to Hollywood.  I remember when I still compartmentalized myself and shifted personas based on where I was. A closeted life can be very painful because it’s often something we experience alone.

    With coming out, often comes a myriad of challenges, but time usually helps a trans woman develop confidence and a more positive relationship with herself. However, the first few years of her transition will be rough.

    When The Egg Cracks and the World Opens Up

    When I first came out as trans, I told people online before I told anyone in my actual life. I essentially started figuring out that I was transgender when I was around 13 or 14. It wouldn’t be until I was 15 that I really started understanding that I was transgender and that started the beginning of the fracturing of myself. I went by a different name and persona on the internet, and in the early days of my trans life, this was incredibly helpful for my own self-actualization. I felt I had to pretend to be someone else to survive my parents and my educational environment. I initially came out as Gender Queer, and what that looked like for me at the time was androgyny at school and de-gendering myself at home. At the time, my friends were my biggest support system, even if they didn’t fully understand my gender because I didn’t understand it either at the time. What I appreciated about them was just how they were there for me, but in retrospect, I also know this was a time when I was perhaps a bit unkind towards them because of my own insecurities. I felt very misunderstood, and I genuinely struggled to maintain my friendship with them, largely because they grew up with me and were completely aware of who I was. They remembered who I used to be, and that bothered me a lot at the time. So I distanced myself from them, but it was easy for me since I was heading off to college in a few years.

    When I went to CalArts in my first year, I had already attended the summer school program, CSSA, the previous year. Many of my classmates met me as a mohawk-wearing gender-queer person, and by the end of my first year, I’d fully accepted that I was actually a trans woman. Back then, I had predominantly cis female friends. These friends meant well, but their support often came in the form of speaking down to me or telling me how to perform gender. One friend used to constantly refer to me by a name that combined my dead name and my chosen name. They did this for years, all through college, even as my transition progressed. For them, this was support; for me, it was their way of always asserting that I wasn’t who I am. They said my new name was too complicated and that they didn’t really like it, so they preferred to use a version of both names. Eventually, I stopped talking to that friend.

    I cut off a lot of “friends” when I recognized an either paternalistic or transphobic attitude towards me. I found that cis women were eager to direct me towards how to perform femininity properly. I’ve always been alternative, and much of the advice my cis woman friends gave me leaned into hyperfeminine styles that didn’t really resonate with me. They wanted to teach me how to walk in heels, how to wear makeup, and how to walk and talk like them. But I wasn’t trying to be them; I was trying to be myself. I was trying to be the person I’d already started to develop, but hadn’t had the chance to embody beyond my bedroom.  I got the impression from many of my old so-called friends that they didn’t particularly like the more empowered version of me.

    I think of my friendships early in transition as two distinct eras. There was the pet era, when they saw me as this sort of group makeover project: checking in every day to see how I’d improved, measuring my femininity, and giving me a score for it. Then there was the threat era, when I started to pass. This started happening early in my sophomore year of college. Suddenly, I was receiving male attention, and many of those men did not know that I was transgender. This is when some of my “friends” started outing me regularly. If a guy they liked was interested in me, they’d whisper to them that I was transgender. They’d still smile in my face, but they always wanted to out me so they could remove me from what they saw as the competition. Friends of transgender people should understand that the person they’ve known pre-transition was often a less confident version of who they actually are. Some people seem to only appreciate newly out trans women when they are able to be paternalistic towards them.

    I did not want condescending advice about how I could be more feminine or exasperation when I vented about some of the experiences I was having. I wanted my friends to be my friends, and I wanted to feel as if they were on my side, not snickering behind my back. When I came out as transgender, I had the pattern of moving on quite quickly from friend groups. If I got a sense that they were less than accepting, I just moved on to the next group of people that I meshed with. Those first years were rough, but I was the center of so much scandal during the early days of my transition that I had to move accordingly. Very few people can fully tolerate the chaos that often comes with a person being newly out as transgender. It’s beautiful to me that you’re willing to support your partner through their transition.

    Actionable Steps

    Frankly, I think sometimes relationships, romantic or otherwise do not last through transition, but I think if they do, it’s because of the patience and understanding of the cis people in their lives. I’d say my biggest piece of advice is to listen to them, be there for them, and be willing to be a buffer between them and the transphobes around them that will feel more comfortable being transphobic around you than they will be in front of your them.

    There WILL be times where your partner makes a mistake that you indeed understand is a mistake, and sometimes they will have to learn that lesson the hard way, and will not heed your advice. Often times trans people have to go through a bit of a second maturity where they begin with these cookie cutter ideas of their gender, and time informs them of which parts of that are true to them. There will indeed be an era of cringe and mistakes, but be there for them as they go through it. If they want your perspective, they will indeed ask and interrogate.

    I hope this answered your question! I look forward to getting more requests!

  • My “More Beautiful” Understanding of Womanhood Cannot Ignore The Reality of How Trans Women Experience Sexual Violence

    (Featured image by: @Mypolyamlife)

    (Reading of this article available for Youtube Members and Patreon Members)
    Recently, podcaster Drew Afualo got into some controversy when an old podcast clip about transgender women went viral. Their non-binary guest, ER, said the following:

    It’s not surprising that cis women online are upset about this take. Honestly, I have a lot of thoughts about it, and I want to dig into them here.

    Upon listening to this clip, my immediate thought was that, as a survivor, sexual violence is something I can’t entirely disconnect from my experience of womanhood. I transitioned quite young, and I remember a shift that happened in my life where suddenly I was receiving a certain amount of attention from men that I didn’t exactly understand. As a child, I started to develop breasts; for reasons I’m still not exactly sure. It was likely just your classic gynochomastia, but coupled with my generally feminine voice and way of carrying myself, it was not that uncommon for people to assume that I was a little girl. I remember when I would go to Hollywood by myself as a pre-teen, and I started to experience street harassment. Men would pull up alongside me as I walked down the street, asking where I was going and whether I needed a ride. My parents didn’t raise me like a little girl with any education about how this sort of attention from men wasn’t good. Unfortunately, several men would take advantage of that ignorance, and I spent my youth in a wave of hypersexuality where I was attempting to repeat some of the more coercive experiences I had with men in a way that felt empowering, instead of disempowering. Of course, ultimately all this meant was that more men had access to me when I was a minor, and it’s actually taken me a while to recognize and accept that I was trafficked as a child.

    I guess for me, for quite some time, it was very hard for me to separate these experiences from my own conception of self because it often felt like my femininity was the reason I was being assaulted. It took me a while to accept that my first rapist, who drugged and raped me, was actually an adult who decided to prey on what was obviously a child. Beneath my hypersexuality was this confidence that, because of the shape of my body, the way I was dressed, and the way I carried myself, I was to blame for why I was assaulted multiple times. I’ve experienced sexual violence routinely for most of my life. As recently as a year and a half ago, my Uber driver sexually assaulted me, and to this day, I still have nerves around taking Ubers to and from the club because I still occasionally feel like the way my body is shaped is part of why I experience sexual violence. It’s an idea that is hard to get out of my mind because of trauma and how my assault seemed to line up with my overtly feminine expressions. It doesn’t help that oftentimes when I speak of my experiences with sexual violence, cis women often respond with “ welcome to womanhood,” as if I haven’t been a transgender woman for most of my life. The truth is, there have been so few phases of my life where sexual violence was not a constant threat and fear, and what I know is that no one particularly cares when a trans woman is assaulted. I’ve never reported, and likely never will.

    I get where  Drew and ER are coming from. For cis women, being raised as girls means these experiences are baked in from the start. A lot of cis women end up believing their femininity is the reason they were assaulted, and that informs their often conflicted relationship with their femininity, and shapes how they move through the world. Some will even change everything about themselves, hoping it will keep them safe. Many women endure sexual violence in silence. In a culture where Epstein’s associates run the world and influence culture, it often feels as if sexual violence is an inevitable and central part of our culture that objectifies women and fights tooth and nail to limit their possibilities. I get the real sense in my life that sexual violence was weaponized against me; utilized to humble and immobilize me. The reality is, sexual violence shapes how you exist in the world, and it’s something women are forced to keep in the back of their minds all the time.

    I think what ER was really trying to say is that a lot of trans women start out with a kind of hopeful, maybe even idealized, view of womanhood. When you’re reaching for femininity for the first time, it can feel new and exciting, and you haven’t yet had years of being told your body is the reason for the violence you face. Trans women often embrace things that cis women have learned to let go of just to avoid harassment. Remember when Dylan Mulvaney shared her ‘girlhood’ online? A lot of cis women saw that as making fun of femininity, even though that probably wasn’t the intention. I get why women who have lived through the rough parts of being a woman in a misogynistic world might feel like she glossed over all the hard stuff to celebrate the hot pink artifice of it all. For many women, the reality of having a uterus and living as a woman in this culture is complicated, and all of it- the good, the bad, and the ugly- shapes how they see themselves.

    Another thing that comes to mind is how this idea of a trans woman having a positive relationship with womanhood usually comes from someone who’s still pretty new to living as a trans woman. I notice people talk about trans women like we only get a few years to live in our ‘truth’; and sometimes it feels like people don’t expect us to live this long. People often don’t understand that while dehumanization can of course come in a less than flattering form, deification- the elevation of a person to an almost fictional, god-like position- is also dehumanizing. We get reduced to symbols or hypotheticals, and the complexities of life get left out of the conversation. Deification is dehumanizing because it will always inevitably result in someone not living up to  the over-idealized standard they’re held to. When I saw that clip, I knew it would open the door for more attacks on trans women, all because of what two people who aren’t even trans women said about us. Sure, that first taste of femininity can feel inspiring, but over time, reality sets in and the story gets a lot more complicated.

    I love being a transgender woman. If I could go back, I wouldn’t change much, except maybe how naive I was about the world when I first transitioned. I wish I’d understood sooner that the men who hurt me were always going to do that, no matter what I looked like or how I acted. I’d like to say I don’t still blame myself, or my body, or my femininity, but that wouldn’t be true. I know it’s not reasonable to live in constant fear, but trauma often gives you fears that feel irrational until they’re confirmed. When I was last assaulted, it shocked me because I felt as if the era of my life where assault happened to me had come to a close. I naively believed that my consciousness about sexual violence would in some way prevent it from happening to me, but it still did. I’ve never really had the luxury of not being afraid of sexual violence because it’s happened frequently enough to me for it to feel like a common part of life. Rape changes you, and I’m still learning how to live with that.

    I think one of the most alienating realities of being a transgender woman is that, yes, we do actually experience many of the same things as cis women. Still, trans women are more likely to experience sexual violence than most survivors. It’s certainly not a competition, and at the end of the day, most of these things come back to misogyny and a rape culture that creates a circumstance where trans women, because of their dehumanization, become the perfect victims who, because of their circumstance, never report the violence that happens to them. Those who abuse trans women can count on transphobia to create a barrier of protection for them. Frequently, trans women are assaulted, and then criminalized once they report it. When I was raped for the first time, it was at the start of me being trafficked, and I remember feeling like no one would ever believe me, and that even though he’d done these things to me, I was still much safer with him. Of course, that’s how grooming works, but still. I haven’t reported it to this day, and likely never will. Those who harm trans women rely on that. When trans women are imprisoned with men, they often experience v-coding, where they are trafficked to violent inmates to absorb their violence, physically and sexually. Many trans women only end up in prison because they are forced to do survival sex work on the streets, all within a culture that is increasingly removing civil rights protections for them, where a genocide is indeed happening to them.

    The situation for trans women is quite bleak, and it often feels reductive to fixate on the fluffier, more shallow aspects of how a trans woman is experiencing her life. We can celebrate trans women’s relationship with femininity without comparing it to a cis woman’s. I don’t know Drew or ER, but it seems like their relationships with trans women don’t go very deep. Maybe the trans women they know are still early in their journeys and need that kind of validation, so hearing ‘trans women have a more beautiful relationship with womanhood’ feels good to them. But to me, those kinds of statements just sound like empty flattery; they’re so over the top, it’s hard to take them seriously. Maybe Drew and ER really do find something refreshing in how some trans women see their femininity, since it’s not weighed down by all the baggage that comes with being a woman in this culture. Still, I think drawing a line between how trans and cis women understand womanhood just isn’t helpful.

    It’s interessting that so many cis women have misinterpreted ER’s statements as “trans women are better women than cis women”; and, ironically, in response to that idea, they did indeed affirm that their relationship with their womanhood is related to their fear of sexual violence and the way their biological functions have traumatized them. So it’s less that ER was wrong; it’s that they dared to compare a cis woman’s experience to a trans woman’s. There’s a very meta layer of this conversation because on both ends, there’s this idea that a trans woman’s womanhood relies greatly on validation or affirmation from cis women, and those designated female at birth. The desire to over-compliment trans women and deify them is often paired with the subtext that trans women need the affirmation of others for their womanhood to be valid. There’s this sense that her womanhood is conditional, and every time a trans woman steps out of line, suddenly she/her becomes they/them, and it’s reinforced that she isn’t quite a woman after all. What I’ve had to recognize with time is that I could choose to disengage from feminism. I can deny the existence of misogyny, but whether I do that or not, I will still experience misogyny. To my point, sexual violence will still be something I have to fear because of the reality of the world I live in. I cannot separate myself from women and their experiences. I cannot pretend that misogynistic violence will never happen to me. It is, in fact, naive to believe otherwise.

    The truth is, if you ask any woman about her experience of womanhood, you’ll get a different answer every time. Black women will have a different perspective than white women. Women from different religions will see their womanhood in their own way. You’ll meet both trans and cis women who have a bright, hopeful view of femininity, and you’ll meet trans women who can’t separate their experience of womanhood from sexual violence. For me, what matters most is recognizing and respecting all those different experiences, rather than using them to judge or rank one another. That only helps the people who want to keep us divided. The clip from that podcast is actually a year old, and it’s trending during a time when a lot of other negative stories about transgender women are trending. From where I’m sitting, there is a very clear and concerted effort to engender hatred towards transgender women specifically. The point is to dehumanize us to the point where, when violence does happen to us, no one will care.

    While we debate who has a more beautiful understanding of womanhood, a trans woman named Autumn Hill is sitting in men’s prison for simply going to a protest opposing ICE. She’ll be in prison for 50 years, meaning she’s getting more time than the people who trafficked little girls for Epstein. It’s worth noting that the girls taken by ICE are mysteriously getting pregnant in ICE facilities around the country. A trans woman named Ava Cordero was one of the first people to call out Epstein for his trafficking of herself and other girls, but when she came out, all people could do was invalidate her womanhood. We are all suffering under patriarchy and misogyny is a weapon wielded against women whether they are transgender or not. Misogynists are the only ones who benefit from our division.

  • They’re Accusing Me of Being A Grifter….

    (The photo attached to this post was taken by @mypolyamlife)

    So, I’m being accused of being a grifter, and I sorta found that funny, and I think this may be the perfect time to update y’all about some of my feelings about what I’m doing on social media.

    Over the past few years, I’ve been shifting away from many of the topics I’ve historically discussed; mostly out of a desire to try new things. On TikTok right now, some people are barely older than my 20-year career of publishing informative content online, and they’ve begun calling me a grifter, essentially because I don’t align with them ideologically 100% of the time. What’s so laughable about that is that I’ve been in this very experimental space for the past few years with my content, and everything is telling me to withdraw from many of the topics that, in reality, do make me less successful as a content creator.

    I think people don’t really register that I created a YouTube channel to seek community many years ago, when I was a lonely teenager. I found some of that community online, but offline, I mostly found men who were eager to exploit me as a transgender teenager. My experience with coercion and exploitation has given me a particular passion for feminism and women’s issues. It took me quite some time to register that the experience I was having was a reflection of the misogynistic culture where men exploit transphobia to get away with the sexual abuse of transgender women and girls. I felt very alone in my experiences as a survivor, so over the years, I’ve tried to pull myself through many of those feelings to have larger, more informative conversations about my experiences, which are often completely ignored. I have often felt like I was alone on an island advocating for myself, because in reality, the only person I’ve ever really had is myself.

    Sometimes when I talk about this era of my life, it feels like I’m trying to ask my audience for pity, and to be frank, my upbringing makes this feel very distasteful to me. I don’t like pity; I really dislike people feeling sorry for me, and I am not great at asking for or receiving help. Similar to how it took me years to accept that I didn’t deserve to be drugged and raped by my first rapist, I struggle not to feel like many of the things that were, in fact, done to me were my fault. As a content creator, I’ve struggled with the idea that bias is something I have to face. I want to believe that people do not receive my content differently than they receive a white person’s content, but that’s something that I have not been able to be delusional about at a certain point.

    Something I’ve noticed quite a bit is that many so-called progressives, and even some of the so-called leftists, really resent it when I speak freely and contradict their narratives. In recent discourse about dating preferences, I’ve acknowledged the reality for many women where they are often used to increase a man’s social capital. I spoke about how many men do use women as wombs and how that’s particularly a touchy subject right now during a time when conservatives are attempting to pass a total abortion ban. I think people who are familiar with my work would be relatively unsurprised by my position; I am an outspoken feminist and spent the 2010s being dogpiled for the content I created for EverydayFeminism.com. I was one of many feminist content creators who spoke openly about misogyny, and we were not well received. Most of my colleagues have left the internet, and those who are still online no longer publish feminist content. What I’ve learned as a content creator is that if you want to find a quick way to sabotage your content creator career, talk about feminism. Better yet, be openly transgender and speak about feminism.

    There was a point in time when I could have disappeared even after establishing myself online as an openly trans feminist content creator. As I’ve spoken about many times, I was stealth in my 20s; hiding that I was transgender while living in a conservative community. I am an illustrator, animator, writer, and I have a performing arts background. My YouTube channel started as a sewing channel during the time in my life when I used to make almost all of my clothing. I can run several blogs on different subjects and be relatively successful at it, but I’m stubborn. To be frank, I have a very hard time moving on from subjects like misogyny and rape culture. As a survivor, I find so many of these conversations hard to disengage from because it does feel like we are never really heard in these conversations. As a black trans woman, I especially feel like there aren’t very many people who listen to people like me. Being stealth felt like cowardice; a new closet where I was isolated from the larger queer community. As I’ve moved to LA, begun organizing queer spaces and attending them myself, I’ve started engaging more deeply with the people who were touched by my work.

    It’s slowly registering to me that people have a very high opinion of me, and that was quite hard to conceptualize with how isolated I’ve been through most of my career. Part of why I repeat that I’ve been publishing content for most of my life about these topics is because I often forget about that myself. I still feel very young. I still feel like some of my thoughts and ideas are forming. Still, in all reality, I’ve been publishing content long enough that there are people who were watching me in middle school (omg why weren’t your parents monitoring your internet?), who are not going to college for degrees that I partially inspired them to pursue. I’ve met quite a few people, not just in LA, but all around the country, who walk up to me, recognize me, and say that I’ve influenced them to do good work. From other content creators to activists, social workers, therapists, writers, and educators, I’ve literally met people whose work I’ve directly inspired. There are so many people whose content I see on TikTok who get excited when I follow them because my content partially inspired them. It’s actually a genuinely hard thing for me to conceptualize, but I’ve heard it enough times to realize that I’ve been quite influential.

    I get caught up in loops because I am pretty passionate about the topics I discuss, which is partially why I was so insulted that a white content creator and their supporters have taken to describing me as a “grifter”. What’s interesting to me about this accusation is that I’ve often had grifters surround my content because they needed something to respond. My experience is that I get ire from both anti-feminists and people on the so-called left who are transmisogynistic and anti-black. No, I don’t think that correcting me when I’m wrong is racism. I draw a pretty distinct line between harassment and criticism, and, for clarity, I don’t feel harassed in this particular conversation. That said, I do feel disrespected. It’s one thing to disagree with me, but to insinuate that the last 20 years of my life, where I’ve been uploading this content online, holding largely the same positions, is quite annoying.

    The subject of dating preferences is actually a great example of a subject where people have actively grifted from the content I’ve created. My position on dating preferences has always been an area where I tend to diverge from other people who, frankly, have fewer concerns in their own romantic lives when it comes to navigating around bigotry. Many years ago, I made one of my first videos about the subject, where I spoke about some of my earlier feelings about being rejected as a transgender woman. I spoke about how I was compelled to speak directly with those who rejected me about their bias and suggest that maybe they should indeed give me a chance, and how ultimately I shifted my opinion about that once I actually had experiences with those who aren’t attracted to me. I spoke about how those relationships were degrading and how ultimately. At the same time, I could grant that there is bigotry in a culture that excludes transgender women from people’s dating prospects; ultimately, it felt unhelpful to use dating preferences as a metric for allyship. I have often affirmed that I don’t exactly think accusations of phobia are useful. What was the response from anti-feminist grifters? To say that I wanted to bully men into sleeping with me. Back in the 2010s, it was incredibly common for larger content creators who had misogynistic audiences to make content misrepresenting the ideas of much smaller creators who were marginalized and were unlikely to be truly listened to. Many of my colleagues left the internet during this time. Misogynists hated that we were speaking about these topics, and this was the era when the far right was forming many of its foundations. Even in my own experience with these people, I saw how men and boys online joined in on misogynistic harassment campaigns where they would misrepresent what someone said so that they could get the best engagement. They’d copy each other; some content creators watched other content creators speaking about my content but never actually watched it for themselves to see that it was misrepresented. According to some of these people, I was essentially a black tranny who wanted to enslave white people and force heterosexual men to fuck me or suffer execution. I’m not even being dramatic when I say that’s how it was often presented. So I spent my 20s, as I was coming out of stealth, being massively harassed online for the subjects I still haven’t moved on from.

    The interesting thing about my online presence is that, because I’ve been around for a very long time and was one of the first and only people discussing these topics, I have influenced much of the discourse we have online and much of the language people use about these subjects. I’ve uploaded educational content about race, gender, sexuality, and so much more. However, people rarely want to give me credit, and I saw a bit of that when people were recently reposting my quote without mentioning my name. It is very strange to be in the position I am, where so many people are familiar with my words and my ideas, yet they all act like acknowledging me would put a stain on their argument. Large content creators support me in whispers, and on more than one occasion, I’ve been told that if I withdrew from the subjects I discussed, I’d be more successful.

    I am at an impasse right now. On one hand, I share what I do because of the life I’ve lived—a life where, yes, I have indeed had experiences that may contradict or complicate theory. I cannot pretend that life functions in the neat way we often conceptualize. I cannot pretend that some of my own experiences contradict common narratives. Though occasionally, I wonder how useful my voice is. As I said, I’m quite stubborn, and I speak about these subjects because I care deeply about them, but transparently, within this strange time we’re in, everything is telling me to move on. As I said, I have more I can do, and I have genuinely wondered what it would be like if I stopped focusing on the topics I have. The reality is, they sabotage my platform, and in a way, I’ve sorta said most of the things I want to say. Meeting people who’ve been following me for over a decade who have been inspired by the work I’ve done has also kinda given me the sense that I can, in a way, rest easy.

    The grifter accusation insults me mostly because for the first 15 or so years of creating this content, I made very little money doing it. I often feel the pull to make content about more advertiser-friendly topics because I do have that in me. I’m feeling very creative and inspired right now, and I’ve partially wanted to shift back towards the original goal of my channel. What’s funny is I never really meant to go down this path. I went down this path. After all, I figured out that I developed good communication and public speaking skills because I’ve been making YouTube videos since I was a teenager. YouTube was one of many things I jumped into as a teenager to increase my confidence. Ironically, I did it back then explicitly because I didn’t have an audience and no one was watching… at least I thought. Even back when I was a teenager, my content performed well enough for my classmates to find it, which was mortifying. A decade later, it turns out I was an early adopter of a career many people are just now attempting to get into. I left the animation industry and stopped illustrating to pursue YouTube full-time, and since 2015, I’ve supported myself entirely on my YouTube and speaking income. I’m recognizing that I’m in a very good position right now, and I’m thankful for it.

    So, while I know that I’ll never fully withdraw from these topics, I’m definitely curious what it would be like if I shifted toward more overtly creative endeavors. The reality is, discourse has robbed me of my time. I woke up one day, and I was 35, still having the same conversation I had when I went full-time as a content creator at 25. In many ways, I feel the message that I need to move on, so I’ll be focusing on that in the coming months. I will be thinking and moving with more strategy, and focusing on creating content that is not just monetizable, but easily shared across platforms. The reality is, for a while now, I’ve been off-script because I did need to learn that I don’t always need one. Some of you will remember my heavily scripted content, and I needed a phase where I was less scripted. But the reality is, i’ve been doing this long enough to know how to capitalize on my platform and while that hasn’t really been my focus in many of these unpopular conversations I’m passionate about, every year, I have to kick myself in the ass a bit about getting my platform together, and for a while now I’ve been speaking about placing a certain degree of distance between myself, my audience and my online persona. It feels like it’s just about that time…

  • “Dating Preferences, “Coercion” and the Burden to Undo Patriarchy

    (Members only video of me reading this article)

    Lately, it feels like every corner of social media is obsessed with debating dating preferences. Maybe it’s the influence of shows like Love Island or Married at First Sight, but suddenly everyone wants to announce what they will and won’t tolerate in a partner. I’ll be honest, I don’t really keep up with those shows, but I do notice how quickly the audience labels a man as “sassy” the moment he acts out. From there, every bad attitude he shows is chalked up to some supposed hidden homosexuality, because apparently, only a gay man could possibly dislike a woman. It’s not hard to see the homophobia at play here, where being gay is coded as negative and being straight is seen as a virtue. And when someone points out this bias, it’s usually met with defensiveness, and the same tired story about a woman who found out her “straight” husband wasn’t so straight after all. For a lot of women, finding out your husband is bisexual can feel like the world is ending, especially in a culture that ties a cis het woman’s status to her relationship with a straight man. Catching your husband with another man is often more devastating than catching him with another woman, because it leaves you wondering if you were ever enough. These fears run so deep that many straight women just write off bisexual men entirely. The online conversations about this are always the same: someone says why they wouldn’t date a certain kind of person, someone else calls out the bias, and then the original group doubles down. It’s a cycle I’ve watched play out every year I’ve been online, and I’ve written about it more times than I can count. But what really interests me isn’t the endless back-and-forth, but how these ideas actually play out in real life, especially for minorities who have to navigate dating with the added weight of oppression shaping their options.

    I think any real conversation about dating has to start with some honesty about what dating actually is for most people right now. We’re living in a strange moment where women technically have more options than ever, but at the same time, there’s this conservative push to shove women back into powerless roles. The Red Pill crowd is obsessed with undoing the progress feminism made: giving women the right to make choices for themselves and not just exist as someone’s helpmate. The manosphere loves to complain that women only want the top 1% of men, but really, that’s just resentment that women have standards at all. If a woman says she only dates men over six feet, suddenly she’s public enemy number one in these misogynistic online spaces that have somehow crept all the way into mainstream politics. I wasn’t shocked when Andrew Tate got arrested for trafficking. These men aren’t just learning to hate women; they’re learning to profit off them, too. If you’re even a little attractive and you happen to post on social media, many men will just assume you have an OnlyFans, because that’s how warped their view of women has become. It’s a scary time to be a woman, but thankfully, a lot of women now have the freedom to educate themselves, open their own bank accounts, and not depend on marriage for survival. Even with podcasts and dating shows normalizing and popularizing the shallow gender binary of the so-called high-value male and the so-called “Traditional wife”, more and more women are just opting out of dating men altogether. No amount of shaming them about dying alone with cats has stopped women from looking at the state of things like abortion access and deciding to withhold their time, their bodies, and their energy from men. Some call this the “4B” movement, after the movement by Korean feminists who’ve sworn off men entirely. So the women who are still dating men? They’re picky, and honestly, they should be.

    Here’s my main issue with the whole dating preferences debate: why does anyone else need to know who you would or wouldn’t date? Dating is, by nature, exclusionary, and honestly, it’s private. Most of us can’t help who we’re attracted to, even if those attractions are shaped by bias. I live in a body that’s politicized and othered at every turn. I’ve been rejected for just about every part of who I am. I’m a tall, dark-skinned, Black, transgender woman who’s been plus-size most of her life. I know what it’s like to be outside of most people’s so-called “preferences,” and I’ve had to make peace with that. When people argue about dating preferences, they’re typically not trying to pressure anyone into anything, but rather, they’re attempting to use dating as an entry point for addressing generalized  bigotry that exists even beyond their romantic patterns. For example, a large segment of people would never date a disabled person, and the ableism they hold in their romantic lives isn’t often limited to just that conversation. That discriminatory attitude can cause them to have a poor view of disabled people, and especially those who date them beyond their own personal romantic connections. However, people tend to be incredibly defensive when you draw attention to this because many people feel they cannot control who they’re attracted to, even if it is indeed influenced by an oppressive culture that frames certain people as undesirable. Additionally, personally, what I’m stuck with is the reality of people trying to unlearn their biases through dating me. I’ve often been the first trans woman a man has dated, and I’ve watched some of those men go from ignorant and even harmful to genuinely respectful and able to date other women like me with more care. But being someone’s first is exhausting. It’s degrading to feel like you’re just an experiment, not a person. When you’re outside what people are used to, experimentation is often all you’re ever offered. Those relationships never did much for me, even if they helped those men grow. I spent years turning down men who just wanted to try me out, and being picky about that (among other things) is what led me to the healthy relationships I have now. I’ve kissed a lot of frogs, and every mistake taught me more about the kind of man I actually want.

    It took me a while to notice that Edward, Nathan, and Alexander all share the same core qualities that make our relationship work so well. I’m not saying we never have conflict, but it’s rare, because we’ve all put in the work on ourselves and keep doing it. Every one of my boyfriends knew they wanted a real, long-term relationship with a trans woman before we ever met. They weren’t in the experimenting phase. They’re confident, self-aware, have been to therapy, know their limits, and can actually communicate. They’re leftists, and they’re not afraid to defend me in a world that’s increasingly hostile towards me. I turned away a lot of men before them, and these are the only ones who get to see me with my guard down. I trust them, and we’re open with each other about everything. I live my life out loud, and I have no interest in men who are so stuck in tradition that they can’t see me for who I am. After my last monogamous relationship, I promised myself I’d never lose my sense of self to a man’s preferences or controlever again. I refuse to live a life where my image depends on a man, or his on me. Being picky is exactly what led me to these amazing, competent partners. If I hadn’t excluded a long list of men from my dating pool, I never would have found them. When I was single, men would get offended that I didn’t want to date those who were inexperienced or unsure about their attraction to trans women. I’ve been pressured to let my guard down just to help a man grow, and I resent that. That’s patriarchy talking. My body isn’t a classroom for men.

    As I’ve written about before, I think that bisexuals experience biphobia, and I do think that excluding someone from your dating pool because they are bisexual is, in fact, biphobic. When you ask women why they wouldn’t date a bisexual man, the answer you’re going to get is almost always going to be something homophobic. Within this current discourse, people are talking about how they don’t want to be with a man who gets bent over by other men. This reveals that part of their disdain for bisexual men comes from the very idea that being with a man is somewhat degrading, which is something most straight women often have to internalize as they pursue relationships with men, who are typically their biggest predators. The women who reject bisexual men are typically working from a series of shallow stereotypes that aren’t universally true for all bisexual men. Just because a man is bisexual doesn’t mean he couldn’t be in a long-term, loving relationship with a cis woman and be completely content within that relationship. Bisexual men are more likely to be tested for STDs and STIs than heterosexual men, which is partially why they’re overrepresented when it comes to STD and STI statistics. Many of the anxieties straight women have around bisexual men are equally applicable to heterosexual men. Still, for many heterosexual women, a man being heterosexual is almost a manifestation of the quality of his character (which is, of course, homophobic). I don’t actually contend any of those thoughts, as I know that it is factually true that most women reject bisexual men because of biphobia. That said, my contention is about how this conversation is often had, and how it feels very disconnected from the reality of how people shift a bias they were propagandized into.

    Honestly, while it’s true that calling out straight women for being homophobic is technically correct, I don’t think it’s the best way to actually teach anyone about bias. Like I said before, dating is personal and exclusionary, and the people who are loudest about their bigoted preferences are usually the least open to changing them. I get why people feel the need to call out bigotry in this context; it can feel cathartic, even righteous. I’m all for standing up to homophobia, but I’ve seen that most of these debates just end up creating more of it. It’s the same cycle, over and over. Every time a bisexual man says a woman is biphobic for not dating bi men, straight women hear that as pressure, because they live in a culture that’s always trying to shame and push them past their boundaries. There’s this underlying resentment that women even have the right to say no to certain men. That comes from a deep entitlement to women’s bodies, and in this conversation, I don’t think enough people are acknowledging that this is the reality most women live within.

    While a plurality of sexualities and genders reject bisexual men, people do seem to focus a lot of their criticism on cis het women. Perhaps it’s because cis het women speak the most frequently about not desiring bisexual men. Either way, what I’ve observed in this discourse is that much of it is spent trying to humble straight women and getting them to admit that they are not allies to the LGBT community. For many of those women, this feels like a strategy designed to shame them into sleeping with bisexual men. Even if that’s not what’s being said, it clearly feels like that to them for a reason. When the voice memo guy story was more viral, many people shamed heterosexual women for having a negative response to a voice memo that amounted to “if you’re not gonna put out next time, don’t expect me to come over”. When cis het women say no, they are often shamed as not being open-minded enough. For many women who’ve been traumatized by that sort of thing, it’s incredibly easy to interpret any conversation that would describe her as closed-minded after saying no as a coercive conversation, because that is typically the goal of that sort of shaming. And let’s not be coy here: shame is indeed the goal. The people making this argument may not be trying to coerce them, but they are certainly trying to shame them through an accusation of bigotry. Allyship is not something you claim for yourself, but many of these women imagined that their tolerance and advocacy were sufficient until they were told that their support wasn’t going far enough once they stated they would not date a bisexual man. For many cis het women, this just feels like additional pressure, and the reality is, as long as this entitlement to women’s bodies is the norm, women are likely to respond negatively to any criticism of who they romantically discriminate against.

    If you want to wade into this argument, you have to know that this accusation is coming your way. A lot of cis het women who know they don’t want to be with bisexual men feel like they’re being pressured to date them just to keep their allyship card. That’s a misunderstanding, but it’s also very human to get defensive about who you’re attracted to. I’ve watched these conversations play out for years, and honestly, they rarely change anyone’s mind. Telling someone, “The people you’re attracted to are a reflection of your internalized bias,” might be true, but it’s not convincing. It just makes people dig in their heels and find others who agree with them. If you want to change minds, you have to understand why people feel the way they do. A lot of people in this conversation can correctly point out that patriarchy is the real issue we’re all circling around. But there’s still not enough understanding of how patriarchy actually impacts straight women, or how much work it takes to unlearn those messages. That’s not something you can fix in one conversation.

    When I excluded bisexual men from my dating pool, I’d never met a bisexual man or truly dated one who was openly bisexual. As a trans woman, I had insecurity about dating a man who desired men because that felt misgendering to me, and that built within me a homophobic bias that shamed men for bottoming or desiring any interaction with a penis. After being in a 6-year, incredibly vanilla, monogamous relationship with my ex, I wanted a change. That’s where I met Nathan, my bisexual partner of ten years. Nathan really spoiled me in terms of bisexual men. He had already been through a marriage, already deprogrammed from religion, and genuinely did not care what other people thought of him. He was completely fine with people seeing him as a gay man, though people tend not to. He’s the kinda guy that has to wear rainbow things for most people to pick up on him being in the acronym. He isn’t ashamed; that’s just who he is, and he’s proud. From him, I exclusively dated bisexual men for a season, and I found that many of them, well, had preferences. My relationships with most bisexual men were destined to end once they found a cis woman they could potentially marry and have children with. Many of the men I dated in my first few years of living in LA have gone on to do just that. Many of those men did not want to be in relationships that appeared queer, and they were only interested in dating me because I am read as cis within society. I found that many of the bisexual men I dated had incredibly high standards for trans women, but seemingly average standards for cis women. Many of them did not want to date other cis men, and I’d say many of them were honestly repulsed by them to some degree. My impression is that beyond things like hygiene and social currency, bisexual men often avoid dating men, well, because they’re dangerous. Many of the bisexual men I’ve known are indeed terrified of men, and of being taken advantage of by them. With that in mind, it’s odd to me that it seems as if some people greatly estimate how dangerous cis men are for cis women. Cis men benefit the most from patriarchy, and often abuse women to reaffirm their place within it. For cis women, there are no downsides to being overly careful about who they’re intimate with, especially in our increasingly misogynistic culture that wants to trap women into marriages.

    I suppose my era of dating bisexual men exclusively shifts some of my feelings about some of the points made in this particular debate. It’s anecdotal, but I spent my youth being pursued by closeted bisexual men, who, yes, were indeed seeking something outside of their relationship that their wives could not give them. I cannot deny the truth of some stereotypes, even if I affirm that applying them universally is harmful.

    When I hear cishet women being biphobic and saying they don’t want to be with bisexual men, what I really hear is them fighting for what they see as an honest man who wants to be with them, someone who won’t make them feel insecure by taking what feels like a weaker position under patriarchy. A lot of women in this conversation are just trying to get what they can from the system they’re in. For many cis het women, patriarchy can feel protective. These ideas about masculinity and traditional gender roles give her what she’s been taught to see as safety. But in reality, most of these women have never actually been with the hypermasculine, heterosexual man they imagine will make them feel secure. I think, in this and in other areas, it’s real-life experience that actually shifts people’s ideas. I had to try being a housewife before I realized how disempowering that really is. That seems obvious to me now, but it wasn’t back then.

    I will not excuse or defend the patriarchy, but I do think people underestimate the depth of how people internalize it. Many women will genuinely not see that patriarchy is not protection until they’re in a situation where they are isolated and their entire life revolves around keeping a man happy. I think while the dating preference conversation is making valid and truthful points, the inevitable reaction to this conversation by cis het women will always be a negative one because even if it’s true that these women are homophobic, that doesn’t satisfactorily acknowledge that these women are indeed in a precarious position under patriarchy. Misogyny is what keeps the patriarchy alive, and it’s the basis of homophobia, which exists to stigmatize those who define themselves outside of the cis-hetero paradigm. Again, I think these women are indeed engaging in homophobia, and perhaps people should call it out. However, for me personally, as conservatives push for a national abortion ban, I’m still acutely aware of how women are objectified and policed within society, and it just doesn’t seem useful to debate with women about who they date. While I think we should call out the women who use their platforms to promote homophobia in the name of defending their “preference,” is it really the worst thing in the world that a cis woman may, at a bare minimum, want to make sure the man she has children with truly desires her beyond being a womb?

    As I’ve said, a large majority of the bisexual men I’ve dated desired their own children and used that as the reason why they would never desire a long-term relationship with a person who wasn’t a cis woman. Anecdotally, I’ve met far more bisexual men who want children than I’ve met heterosexual men who want children, and that was fairly surprising to me. Many bisexual men have overtly stated that their long-term goal is securing a cis woman as a wife. Some in this discourse are shifting the conversation towards blaming these women for the existence of closeted men, with the subtextual argument that these women should be more open-minded if they want men to be honest about their sexuality. This, like many things, places the pressure on women to carry the burden of what is truly a man’s own journey. Outside of Nathan, I know many men who are proudly and openly bisexual, and yes, some of them have children with wives who accept their bisexuality. I will never shame anyone for remaining closeted, but I do think those who remain closeted so they can reproduce are reinforcing some fairly unfortunate narratives about deceptive bisexual men.

    If there’s one thing my life has taught me, it’s not to lose sleep over people who don’t want me, and to choose my battles wisely. After years of talking and writing about this, I know this debate isn’t going anywhere. If anything, I think it’s worth warning anyone who jumps into this topic that the conversation will never really end, and when it comes to helping people move past their biases, there are better, more persuasive ways to do it. People will always be defensive about who they date, and in a world that still tries to control women, I doubt there will ever be a time when women aren’t defensive about who they’re dating and why. I don’t think straight cis women deserve a special pass for bigotry, and I think you should call it out if you can, but just know it’s probably one of the least effective ways to actually change someone’s mind. As long as we’re still fighting for bodily autonomy in a culture where men feel entitled to women’s bodies, most of these conversations criticizing women’s dating preferences will fall flat and are easily dismissed.

  • Yes, Tyla’s Team Used AI…

    Yesterday, Tyla posted a teaser for the music video for That Girl that she is releasing today. When it came in my feed, I immediately saw the AI. As an animator, it was incredibly obvious to me. However, many of her fans seemed to deny that the popular South African beauty would ever dip her toes into AI.

    The video was created by Biuro, a company that acknowledges its use of generative AI in an interview with Coevall magazine.

    Text excerpt discussing the role of artificial intelligence in biuro's creative practice, including its use as a tool and its relationship with artistic vision.

    When I left a comment under the video that literally just acknowledged the very visible AI, people attacked me. They denied the AI usage, and some of them were quite demeaning. It honestly makes me pretty happy that I don’t have a parasocial relationship with any celebrity. I like Tyla’s music. Her recent collab with Zara Larson has been stuck in my head since its release. It was actually the first song I played when I set my new speakers up for my computer. I don’t hate her because I see AI.

    Biuro would leave this comment on the post, and you’ll notice that they don’t actually deny AI usage.

    Comment discussing the extensive manual effort involved in a digital project, including filming, animation, coloring, and editing, highlighting over 150 hours of compositing work.

    This is one of those situations where they’re telling the truth, but only half of it. Again, you’ll notice they do not deny the usage of AI, they just say human hands were used in its creation; which I think is obviously true, but that does not actually mean they did not use AI. Was this in reference to the entire video or just this video? Still, I wanted to break down what I saw as an animator looking at these clips that made it obvious to me this was AI before I found out that the company openly admits to it.

    This first scene looks like an AI movement applied to a still (potentially generated) image. It was “composited” in that they added the brick backdrop (which is in focus for some reason) and ripple animation for the puddle on the ground. They probably also did some color correction and likely duplicated a single animation and changed the colors for variety (not a sin), which is why they’re moving at the same pace

    This particular scene is pretty damning. First of all, that hand is wrong- try to put your pointer finger out like that. It’s pretty unnatural. There’s also a floating tiger face, and it doesn’t have a body. The motion also doesn’t make sense. If he’s wagging his finger as if to say “no no no!l” that movement is more in the wrist than the elbow and shoulder. You can also see AI artifacting on the hand. It looks like this could be simply a very poorly executed puppet tool animation on a generated image, but I doubt it

    This scene is rather straightforward. A video of a puddle with the same ripple effect from the first scene applied to the water and the title, with a rain effect applied in post. The reflection is a bit confusing to me tho. Is that a bus?

    The last scene is kinda what gave it away for me because the mirror image of Tyla is a very commonly seen AI-generated style. YES, Tyla stood in front of a green screen, and that image was then taken into post and used for this image, and there is a comic book effect in the background that was also edited by hand, along with the texture. As Biuro says, they DID do some of this by hand, but if you’re imagining that it’s Disney 2D animation drawn by hand, you’re very wrong. It looks to me like they may have used a few still frames and a bit of the moving film they took of her for the frames that are closer together (which is kinda cool tbh).

    I’m actually very glad to see so many people understand the difference between CGI and AI! I do get annoyed when people think everything digital is AI! But this is a company that DOES use AI in most of their projects, and you can see that clearly on their Instagram. Compare the movement in these images to the first scene.

    Tyla’s fans can be in denial about this if they want. Still, in general, the sense I get is that her audience in general doesn’t care about AI (which is probably why they went with a company that says “Artificial intelligence has always been at the core of biuro’s practice”). A large amount of Tyla’s audience is comfortable with AI, and a decent portion of them actively enjoy and support AI-generated content. People are asking me why I’m even commenting on it, and this was the comment that pissed her fans off:

    I like Tyla’s music, but I’m glad I am not in a parasocial relationship with her. It genuinely seems very destabilizing to have this much cognitive dissonance around something plainly obvious. Her fans like AI, so clearly this won’t hurt her. I’m an alternative person, so I already don’t do the celebrity worship thing. I kinda expect this from pop musicians. The AI was disappointing to see, but it’s predictable for acts like her. I think it cheapens her brand for me personally. I will be watching her new MV for the sake of content, but my interest wanes at this point. She won’t lose sleep over it, and I do not hate her. I will loosely root for her from afar. She’s very talented, and I believe she deserves better promo than AI slop. I wish her fans felt the same.

    It would have been cool to get a fully hand-drawn animated project for her. But they won’t get greenlit if her audience proves that AI does the job just fine. Many of my colleagues edit AI instead of animating. Animators will continue to get fewer jobs when the audience proves they aren’t needed. I got out of the animation industry a long time ago, but I’m still passionate about the art form, which is why this bothers me. I graduated with a degree in Character Animation in 2021 from CalArts, a school that was started in part by Walt Disney. I spent my youth aspiring to be an animator and ultimately ended up being a YouTuber. These companies rely on an undereducated audience who will accept lower-quality work because of parasociality. Ultimately, what depresses me about AI animation is that I don’t think it’ll ever stick in our brains nearly as much as the traditional animation being referenced in this post.

    Edit:

    Tyla’s music video has been released. and as you can see, it’s full of AI. You can see a members only video of my full reaction to the music video below or on Patreon.

  • What Men Can Learn From The Voice Memo Guy

    After a week of everyone talking about The Voice Memo Guy, I couldn’t help but think about the men I know who somehow always manage to keep casual sexual relationships going. As a sex positive person who surrounds herself with people engaged in sex positivity, it’s quite funny to me that many seem not to know that there are indeed men who manage to successfully have casual sex. What’s less funny to me is that so many seem to think of the voice memo as if it’s the gold standard for clear communication. From what we know, these two met on Hinge, had a decent first date, and then, after she hesitated when he brought up sex, he followed up with a call to see if she’d be open to sex on the second date. In his message, he repeats that he doesn’t want to waste his time and that sex is a huge factor for him in figuring out if he’s compatible with someone. On the surface, sure, this is “direct” communication, and there’s nothing technically wrong with asking if you’re on the same page. But if you’ve been around long enough, you recognize the utilization of therapy-speak to nudge a woman into sex before she’s ready.

    As I discuss in my YouTube video, I believe the context of him sending her the message on the exact same night they met, immediately after she had already rejected him, comes off as him pushing her boundaries, not attempting to get her consent. While we can debate this issue to death, I do feel the need to point out that a very similar voice note appeared on an episode of Second Date Update on the Radio show, where hosts Brooke and Jeffery spoke to a man named Corey, who similarly stated that “for his sake” he needed sex to feel the “romantic spark”.

    So, it appears to me that this may be a case of men telling other men how to get laid by directing them to women on apps like Hinge, where the tagline is “designed to be deleted”. To me, this draws attention to what was my original perception of the real issue with this voice memo: men are intentionally pursuing women who want a deeper romantic connection for casual sex for the sake of their egos. You have to wonder if the woman who received that voice note knew that her date wanted to have sex by the second date, if she would have even gone on the first date to begin with. As a very polyamorous and sex positive person, I have no issues with people seeking casual sex and even those who look for romantic relationships that start with an emphasis on sex, but the main issue here was that they weren’t on the same page from the very start.

    All this talk has sparked some pretty revealing conversations. I’ve heard men say women need to stop pretending men aren’t interested in sex on dates. Some guys really relate to not wanting to waste their time or money on a relationship that doesn’t satisfy them. I’ve even seen men call their need for quick sex a “boundary,” which, to me, says a lot. There’s this underlying entitlement, like women should be more eager to have sex, especially if a man is spending money on them. Just the other day, I saw a video go viral of a guy ranting about a woman who hadn’t slept with him after twelve dates, calling her names and venting his frustration to a crowd of men who called him a simp for sticking around. What really gets me is how some people react to the voice memo guy, as if there are so few options out there. Some folks think my take on the voice memo is “sex negative,” but honestly, it comes from my own sex positivity.

    Here’s something I’ve noticed: a lot of men who want casual sex don’t actually want it from women who are also looking for casual sex. They’re searching for women who are hungry for love, women whose hopefulness can be molded into sexual monogamy. They want someone who will be submissive to them and adore them more than they deserve. It’s easy to say it’s good that he was upfront about wanting casual sex, but let’s be real; there’s a reason he didn’t put that in his profile or mention it before the first date. Because he wouldn’t have made it to the first date had she known. For many men, convincing a woman who isn’t looking for casual sex to have it anyway is part of the thrill. And the irony is, these same men often judge women who openly want casual sex.

    Since moving to Los Angeles, I’ve met a whole category of men who always seem to have a full roster. And to be honest, sometimes I’ve been one of those women. I know casual sex, and what really gets under my skin about this whole conversation is that, at its core, it’s about shame. Too many men see casual sex as something they do to women, not something they share with them. The guys who try to talk women looking for romance into casual sex are usually doing it because they can’t handle the idea that women might actually enjoy sex, too. A lot of these men don’t see a problem with the voice memo guy because they’re not upfront about what they want on their profiles. They know being honest would mean fewer matches. I get it, dating apps can make you feel like the only way to get a match is to swipe right on everyone. Men swipe without reading, and then think it’s enough to clarify their intentions before the second date. But honestly, so much of this drama could be avoided if men just edited their profiles to say they’re only looking for casual sex or that they’re eager for it. I know plenty of men who do exactly that, and they’re living the life these other guys only dream about.

    A lot of men seem to think the best way to get casual sex is to find a woman who isn’t looking for it and hope she’ll change her mind if she likes them enough. Honestly, that’s a losing game. The men I know who actually get laid are the ones who see women as people, with their own wants and needs. They put in the effort to learn what makes women happy, and that’s why they’re so popular. The guys who want to convince women to change their minds about casual sex are usually looking for women who haven’t figured out what they like yet. If you ask me, that’s exactly why so many men avoid women who are upfront about wanting casual sex. They don’t want a woman who knows what she wants; they want someone who’ll just go along with what they want, maybe hoping it’ll turn into something more. At some point, these men need to get real with themselves: the sex they have isn’t just about physical satisfaction; it’s about the ego boost. They talk about “sexual compatibility” even as they admit she’s not that into it. The Voice Memo Guy, at the very least, doesn’t get that sex should be mutual. For those of us who actually enjoy casual sex without shame, conversations like this are just weird. He doesn’t want to get to know her, doesn’t want to learn what she likes, and isn’t willing to wait. He wants sex now, and he’s clear that if he doesn’t get it by the second date, he’s out. That only makes sense if you think you’re owed sex. Men who are good with women don’t typically need to send messages like that.

    The men I know who are actually getting laid? They put in the work. They take care of themselves, and by extension, their partners. People act like the only choices are either a super serious, monogamous relationship or some kind of soulless hookup where no one cares about each other. But that’s not true. You can, and probably should, care about your sexual partner even if you aren’t dating them. Far too many people view kindness as something only extended within romantic relationships. Plenty of the sexually successful men I know are great hosts! They might not be in love, but they still care about the people they sleep with. Some even hang out platonically with their partners outside the bedroom. They get a reputation in their friend groups for being good in bed and, more importantly, for being respectful. These are men who have taken the time to actually learn about women, what makes them comfortable, what makes them happy. Too many men see that as emasculating, but honestly, it’s just being a decent human. The men with shorter lists of satisfied women will say that you’re a “simp”, but trust me when I say these men are quite happy to have the adoration of women.

    Women who go after casual sex are usually women who’ve figured out that sex can be fun for its own sake. They’re less likely to be conservative, more likely to know what they want, and they aren’t shy about saying what gets them off. That scares a lot of men. It’s intimidating when a woman knows what she likes, especially if it doesn’t revolve around a man. Even the men who chase after these women can get thrown off by the idea that a woman might want sex without wanting an emotional connection. Some men just can’t accept that women can enjoy sex and be picky about who they sleep with. You see it in incel circles all the time: women get attacked for being “shallow” or for only choosing the guys they find attractive. Women get shamed for having a “high body count,” but also for not wanting to sleep with men they barely know. In my own life, I’ve had sex with men hoping to feel that “romantic spark,” only to be judged for it later. The same men who pressured me into sex would turn around and slut shame me for giving in too soon. Sure, sometimes having sex early leads to a relationship, but misogyny means a lot of men will judge you for it anyway. They sort women into “good” and “bad” categories, and end up being unkind to women who want sex and resentful toward women who don’t. At some point, we have to call it what it is: misogyny.

    Yes, women will sometimes judge men who are upfront about wanting casual sex, but honestly, I don’t see the problem with having a smaller dating pool. Like I’ve said before, dating is inherently exclusionary. The more you know what you want, the fewer people will fit, but the better the fit will be. For the men who don’t see an issue with the voice memo guy, I want you to know there’s a way to be totally honest about what you want and still get it. You can put it right there in your profile that you’re not looking for a relationship. Sure, you’ll turn off some women, but you’ll save everyone’s time, including your own. If you know you want sex early, say so. Maybe it’s good that he showed his true colors early, but all of this could have been avoided if he’d just been upfront from the start. There’d be no need for awkward clarifications. Guys like the Voice Memo Guy are trying to speedrun their way into bed, but most women aren’t going to sleep with someone they don’t even trust.

    If you’re a man looking for casual sex, you need to start by understanding that women live in a world where they’re constantly seen as sexual objects. Our culture pushes women into sex too soon, sometimes with people they don’t even want, just for a sense of safety or acceptance. When I listen to that voice memo, I hear all of that in the background. It sounds like a guy dangling the idea of a relationship in front of a woman who might be insecure, using words like “romantic spark” to mask what he really wants: sex. Maybe he hopes she’ll fall for it and sleep with him, thinking it might turn into something more. That’s manipulation, and I honestly think men are teaching each other these tactics because they’re too afraid to go after women who actually want casual sex.

    If you treat women like NPCs in your own personal game, just there to boost your ego, you’re objectifying women and completely ignoring their humanity. The truth is, these men could be having great sex with women who actually want them, but it would require effort and an ability to communicate clearly and effectively. They’d have to write real things on their profiles, actually read the profiles they swipe on, and maybe even work on themselves a bit. They’d need to take care of themselves, listen to women, and learn what makes women happy. They’d have to accept that women have their own desires, preferences, and yes, boundaries. Sex should be mutual, not something you do to someone else. With all that in mind, the final thing a man should accept is that he does not deserve the woman he desires simply because he desires her. She has to agree to go along with it, which means she should always have enough information to make that decision. Because women are individuals, scripts don’t work on all of them, and I’d say most men fare better without them.

    I’m all for upfront communication in dating, but honestly, the first person you need to be honest with is yourself. Why are you looking for casual sex? Is it just for validation? Are you exploring? Whatever the reason, get real about it. And if you’re going to have casual sex, take care of your sexual health. Don’t go after women who want monogamy just so you can make your sexual health her responsibility. Be a slut if you want, but be a responsible one. Most women who enjoy casual sex aren’t interested in doing it recklessly; they’ll want you to be recently tested. If you’re in LA, check out the Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center for free STD and HIV testing. There’s no shame in looking after your health; it’s part of having a good sex life. Let go of the shame our culture builds around sex: sex is not a value system. Let go of the ego often built into your sexual conquest: sex cannot be won, only shared.

    Honestly, I think people make this way more complicated than it needs to be. The guys who buy into redpill scripts, thinking they can just follow a formula to get laid and protect themselves legally, could just try listening to women and taking them at their word. They’d probably find women trust them more than the average guy who’s just trying to trick them into bed. It’s simple, but misogyny makes it hard for a lot of men to let women take the lead, even when it comes to their own bodies. If you want casual sex, you shouldn’t want it from a woman who isn’t sure what she’s consenting to. Go for women who actually enjoy casual sex and know what they like. If you’re just starting to explore sexually and think you’ll eventually want a monogamous relationship, you should be grateful for women who tell you what they want in bed. It’ll help you in the long run. The men who only go after inexperienced women who praise them because they don’t know any better? They’re the ones who end up confused when their wives stop wanting sex. I see it all the time in couples who open up their relationships. Sometimes, wives stop sleeping with their husbands not because they don’t like sex, but because they’re tired of pretending they ever enjoyed it with him. Men should be looking for mutual enjoyment, not just validation from women who want more than they can give. If you only want casual sex from women who want something serious, maybe it’s time for therapy. At the end of the day, men should be as honest as possible, even if it’s unflattering.

  • The Dapper Delinquent Should Keep His Mustache Out of Lesbian Business

    Another week, another conflict I manage to get into because I’m passionate about people…

    The Dapper Delinquent is a bisexual man who creates content about a wide range of issues, but I primarily seem to receive his content about how lesbians who reject men are a stain on the wider LGBT community. In his most recent campaign against “gold star identities”, he speaks of this supposed trend among, not just lesbians but also people of other sexualities, but primarily focuses his ire towards lesbians, who more commonly use the term.

    A Gold Star Lesbian is a lesbian who has never been with a man. It’s often a term stated ironically, but some do use the term seriously. Those who do tend to use it to celebrate that, within a misogynistic culture where women are pressured to be with men, they never succumb to the pressure and have only been with women. In his video, Ty mentions those who unironically claim the term and then use it to attack other people. In several of his videos, he mentions lesbians rejecting bisexual women; often expressing disgust around them being with men. He bases most of his observations on his comment section or things he’s heard third hand. We are meant to take his observations and render a judgment towards those claiming gold star identities because, as he says “gold star identities are a huge problem in the larger LGBT community”.

    But the problem with this is this is a conclusion he comes to that is emotional, but not proportional. If a gay person has managed to only ever have gay relationships in a culture that discourages them for having them, and rewards them for being in heteronormative ones, they are an extreme rarity within the larger LGBT community. When we are explicitly focusing on lesbians, we are describing an extreme minority within the smallest minority within the LGBT. So to describe them, even collectively as inherently problematic is an over exaggeration.

    The basis of my issue with what the Dapper Delinquent is mostly that he speaks with authority about things he clearly does not understand, and he falls into misogyny and patriarchal thinking quite easily. Contrary to his insinuation, “gold star” is a term that refers primarily to lesbian women and his content may seem to suggest otherwise but you will not find many people using the term who aren’t referring to lesbians. Gay men tend to use “platinum”, but even that isn’t very common. Ty wants to have a conversation about transphobia and biphobia and the gay people who look down on others for ever considering the “opposite” gender. While I think this hypothetical gold star lesbian who is repulsed by a woman sleeping with a man may be worth criticizing if they truly look down on others for not being a gold star, I also know that the label is not synonymous with transphobia or rejection of bisexuals.

    In some of Ty’s content specially about gold star lesbians, he suggests that those who use the term are transphobic because the term suggests that a woman has never been with a man. The insinuation being that trans women are men so naturally that would defeat the gold star status. However, many of the people I’ve known who have claimed the term are themselves transgender women or the partners of transgender women. They use the term to celebrate for themselves that they have never been with men, not to state that they only date lesbians (they don’t; most lesbians date bisexual women) and exclude trans women. So when he says these identities are a problem, he is ignoring that his understanding of this is incredibly limited and that he is not likely, as a man and non sapphic, to really understand this enough to offer thoughtful and necessary reflection on the issue. He is just pulling from a bias within society that shames women for not being available to men. It’s not that I disagree with the central point being made: that people should not be put down or discredited because of their sexual history. It’s that this is the conclusion made of lesbians the moment they express complete disinterest in men, and in much of his content, he seems not to make space for the possibility that a woman can be lesbian in a way where she has never desired a man.

    While Ty does devote some of his time to speaking about non-lesbians who supposedly unironically claim the term, of course much of his content focuses on lesbians. He has accused me of not watching his content, so I figured I would respond clip by clip.

    In this clip, he sets up a hypothetical where a man is asked about another man, and because the man in question isn’t attracted to men, he responds with either disgust or struggles to find an answer. In his rebuttal of this point, he cites this idea that many lesbians are able to conceptualize attraction to men. This is presented as something that is obvious or common. I think this is an important subtext to draw attention to because while I understand what he’s trying to say about how some lesbians are able to, bare minimum, mention a man they admire, this is particularly not true for gold star lesbians who have not ever experienced attraction to men. Ty criticizes a lot of thing about “gold star identities”, that are obviously bad like supremacy and transphobia, but it also seems like he has a hard time accepting that some women simply are not and never will be attracted to men, and an odd comment he liked and responded to seems to suggest that he is particularly suspicious of those who have not sexually experimented.

    The central problem I have with Ty’s content has to do with what I know of being a woman in society and what I know is the disconnect between how lesbians conceptualize their sexuality and how our culture in particular shames them for it. When a woman says she’s a lesbian, the first thing often said back to her is “are you sure? How do you know if you’ve never tried it?”. A culture that centers men, views a lack of attraction to them as a defiant rejection. It’s not just that lesbian aren’t attracted to men, it’s that they have “rejected” them. Lesbians are often told they are simply confused because they have not found the right man. Even if Ty devotes some of his time to criticizing gay men who supposedly brag about never being with women, he should be incredibly aware of the fact that this is a very common, and often violent suggestion made towards lesbians. The idea that these women have yet to meet the right man leads to “corrective rape”, where lesbians are assaulted by men in order to “fix” them. For many lesbians who are not gold star, their relationships with men are deeply traumatic because they were forced on them. This is partially why I do not see the point in attacking the extreme minority of women who have avoided that trauma. A comment I received did a really great job of speaking about this.

    There are many people to hear “lesbian” and think that it’s a challenge. Many men conceptualize that deep down inside a lesbian will, at some point, be attracted to a man. There’s often a confidence around this that I myself have been privy to as a polyamorous trans woman. When I acknowledge that I am not attracted to women, there are many people who refuse to believe me, and I believe lesbians are often experiencing the other side of that. Gender essentialism suggests that women are naturally attracted to men and those who are designated male, regardless of gender identity, will by nature be attracted to women. But of course this isn’t true, and it especially isn’t true for gold star lesbians.

    What Ty should have done is register that the expectation for lesbians to eventually be attracted to men is much more common and much more dangerous than a gold star lesbian believing she is superior to those who’ve slept with men. If he can understand bias, he should understand why lesbians have had a negative response to his content about gold stars. He is a man expressing negative feelings about women who have never been with men. He is policing relationships he is distinctly not involved in and he’s folding transphobia and biphobia into “gold star identities”.

    What’s very interesting is the person (who is non binary) he has called out for rejecting a bi woman is not a gold star and came to point this out.

    “Queer” is a reclaimed slur that many people, self included, have complicated thoughts about. It makes sense to me that the term would resonate with someone like Ty, who to my understanding is bisexual and has perhaps a complex gender identity on top of that. Many people feel solidarity under the queer label and appreciate that it is not a label that specifically nails down an identity. For many it is a fluid identity that can apply to them regardless of how their identity shifts. However, lesbians are often protective of lesbian identity because, again, they exist in a culture that does not celebrate or respect that they are truly women who love women. Beyond this conversation, there is a persistent trend of attempting to erase lesbian identity. When I first started making content about Lesbophobia, I noticed that my content would often be censored or the automated content filters would mark it as inappropriate and adult. Lesbians are objectified to the point where the term “lesbian” is often seen as an inherently pornographic term that needs to be censored.

    Again, it’s not that I disagree with what he’s saying per se. Queer is a term many use and in the way I don’t think we should police lesbian identity, I don’t think we need to police other’s queer identity. Obviously attacking someone for being proud of their label is a bad thing, but clearly this isn’t really a grace extended to lesbians. The conclusion seems to be that those who reject the term queer only do so because of bigotry, and he again, cites transphobia as one of the main reasons. The suggestion here is that lesbian is a less inclusive term than queer, and that the people who reject it do so out of bigotry. I know that isn’t true as a person who does not identify as queer. For me, it’s just a term that doesn’t resonate with me and I’ve always felt that way. The people who tell me I should embrace it tend to have a very paternalistic attitude where they think they can tell me about how to more properly identify. This is just him policing how lesbians describe their own experiences. Lesbians should be able to describe themselves however they want.

    Ty will often take a comment made by one or two people and present it as a supposed trend, but it seems a bit to me like this is the full extent of his engagement. I have the response to his content I do because I live in a big city where I am a community organizer for queer events. I’ve been within sapphic spaces more than a few times and I’ve often helped promote them. If your entire exposure to lesbians is internet discourse, you’re going to get a lot of content that vents about the closed mindedness of lesbians, often by non lesbians who feel entitled to attention from lesbians. You’re also going to get those extremely introverted, often reactionary lesbians who use the internet to say what they can’t say in their own communities. I see so much content online about how these spaces are exclusionary, and don’t get me wrong, sapphic events are not perfect, and often have an issue of race and access with many sapphics desiring events that aren’t centered around substance use. However, if you assume that lesbians are bigoted towards trans people, you are simply not understanding just how complex and expansive these spaces are when it comes to gender.

    Regarding lesbians as uniquely transphobic is lesbophobia that doesn’t align with reality. The last sapphic event I went to was full of trans women, and even some trans men. Lesbians often have a complex relationship with gender and while, sure, plenty of lesbians have no desire to sleep with trans women, my estimation is people tend to assume lesbians are significantly less interested in trans women than they are. I remember when I first went to these spaces and got hit on a ton and I was initially confused because that didn’t align with what the Arielle Scarcellas of the world had told me. It seems to me that there are a lot of people sharing their basic opinions of lesbians who have never been around lesbians. The most they know is that a lesbian does not sleep with men, and from there, people try to make a larger conclusion about lesbians that is presents their rejection of men is somehow problematic. This is the same conclusion homophobes make about lesbians.

    Ty is not a lesbian and as a non-lesbian, he should not care how lesbians define their own sexuality. Even if he doesn’t mean to make this inference, when he makes a video like this as a man, it comes off as him resenting lesbians for distinctly excluding men. The use of “non men” in this context is to acknowledge the complex relationship lesbians have with gender. There are many people who are lesbian in terms of their gender identity, who do not identify as women. Of course this is going to be confusing to non-lesbians who conceptualize that lesbians are women loving women, and ignore that there are people who are lesbian who don’t identify as women, but do identify as lesbian. However, this disconnect is another great example of the difference between being in community and observing it as an outsider.

    Online we have been having a back and forth debate about how trans men shouldn’t identify as lesbians, with many people using what little they know of both trans men and lesbians to say that trans men would feel uncomfortable being folded into the lesbian community. And sure, while that’s very true for many transgender men, there are many trans men who’ve formed community with lesbians, and some who’ve been community organizers for lesbians for decades before recognizing they were trans men. There are a decent portion of trans men who still identify within lesbianism and date women who identify as lesbians. Outsiders obviously are confused by that, but this is yet another reason why many lesbians will prefer dating other people who are themselves lesbian. There’s no need to explain yourself, and many people want to be with people who understand them and shares a similar position in society.

    In another series of videos, Ty goes off about yet another thing he saw online, but this time it was a lesbian who committed the sin of wanting to date a lesbian. Again, I do not think Ty is very self aware of the optics of him making a video like this. He is a white man turning to the camera and dictating to lesbians how they should date women, and which women they should date, and of course he highlights the closed minded nature of a lesbian desiring another lesbian. As I’ve said, this particular person he called out was non binary and not a gold star.

    Biphobia is a very real, very harmful thing. When lesbians reject bisexuals, it’s not hard for me to imagine how hurtful that is, and how that invalidation within a heterosexist culture may cause them to withdraw from queer relationships in favor of heteronormative ones. A lesbian who doesn’t want to date bisexuals who are currently being courted by men understand that our culture privileges bisexuals women for partnering with men. Erasure of your sexuality is not privilege, but a lesbian cannot hide her queerness and thus lesbians often have to contend with a reality where they are othered because of they only love women. Lesbians preferring other lesbians isn’t always about their fear of being replaced by a man or a particular resentment for bisexuals. Again, one of the benefits of being a lesbian dating a lesbian is that there are certain things you don’t have to explain, and for a lesbian who is already isolated within society because she does not date men, dating a woman who dates men puts her in contact with men in a way she may not personally desire. Going back to one of Ty’s original points about how some lesbians are able to conceptualize their attraction to men, bi women will often want to discuss men in a way where they expect participation from the lesbian involved. Many lesbians report that their online dating experience has often been derailed by unicorn hunting couples where the man is presented as a potential third much later in the relationship. Sure, viewing every bisexual with a lens of suspicion is biphobic, but a lesbian preferring a lesbian in a culture where women are pressured to be with men is something I have a hard time taking issue with because I’m not involved. Gay people wanting to date each other makes a ton of sense to me, and while Ty does attempt to speak about men who do the same, his ire for lesbian women is palpable when he describes this desire as “bigoted”.

    Again, I think this is another example of the disconnect between the observations he makes of lesbians online and how lesbians function socially. Most lesbians, because of our culture that pressures women, have at some point been with men or thought they were attracted to men. So a lesbian who rejects women who’ve been with men will find her dating pool will just get smaller and smaller. Lesbians who only date other lesbians are not very common at all. Many of lesbians arrive at the lesbian label, not because they’ve never tried it, but because they have and they have realized they do not feel for men that way. For many lesbians, the idea of being an experiment for a person attempting to figure out their sexuality is off putting. When lesbians express a preference for other lesbians it is often because they want to know the person they are with sees women as romantic potential. It’s simply true that there are bisexuals who will always view their queer relationships as sexual, but their heterosexual relationships as romantic. Many lesbians do not want to be in the position where they register that the person they’re with is using them to figure themselves out. However, the reality is that very few lesbians are even able to find other lesbians within the larger sapphic community so they do tend to date bisexual women. Lesbians are a minority among sapphics, which is also why so many people feel compelled to speak for them and over them.

    Another point that needs to be made here is I believe his position as online observer also allows him to conflate several disconnected ideas. A gold star lesbian is just a woman who has never slept with a man, it isn’t a woman who never sleeps with women who’ve slept with men. In his imagination of the exclusionary gold star, the gold star lesbian looks down on any woman who has never been with a man. It’s a sort of queer purity culture that judges women for their sexual history. But that’s not really what many of the people who adopt the term unironically actually mean.

    I am not going to deny that there are women who claim gold star status who do so to communicate that they are not interested in people with certain genitalia. I’m not going to deny that there are trans women who’ve been rejected by lesbians who are using the term and this is probably quite hurtful to them. That does not then mean the term is inherently transphobic or that there aren’t trans women who identify with the term because they’ve only been with women.

    Here’s a great comment that speaks a bit about the history of the term:

    “ @Ruthless: the actual history is murky, because it’s not well documented- the only facts we know and can point to is that the first time we can find a “written record” as it were, are in the early 90s. it was used by a comedian making fun of lesbians while talking about her year long relationship with a man, and at a similar time used in bisexual media (mostly zines, some are preserved online) also being derisive about what they called “feminist lesbians”, also known as political lesbians. If you’re familiar with feminist/lesbian history, you’ll know that political lesbians are in fact not lesbians- but women who thought of lesbianism as “the ultimate way” to cut men from your life, not women who had actual romantic or sexual interest for other women. anyway, the term was basically an insulting jibe of various levels of seriousness to lesbians of the time “what, do you want a gold star?”, and slowly turned into an actual term for something we didn’t really name before. Now, as always, we can’t help but be sexist and homophobic to lesbians, so now there’s community backlash to the term “gold star” something we didn’t actually come up with, to the best of anyone’s knowledge trying to trace it. There are a couple blog arguments that it “must of course have been used before this”, but that’s not substantiated anywhere, and lesbians active in the 70s and 80s don’t concur.”

    When Ty says “fuck gold star identities”, he is critiquing how lesbians have reclaimed the term as a term for pride. He is criticizing women who do not like men for celebrating that they have not been with men, as a man. What I don’t think he registers is that many of the things he says in his videos are actually very old and outdated lesbophobic tropes and circling most of his conversations back to lesbians is part of why he does that; it’s a common and socially acceptable pattern of behavior.

    While rallying against gold star identities , he describes people who recognized their queerness early as having “good fortune” for recognizing their queerness early on and then in reference to people who did not have heterosexual relationships, he goes on to suggest that “more often than not, you were too sexually awkward to even realize that you were queer”. I know his snazzy style and mustache may make this hard to see, but this is just a centuries old homophobic idea. Gay people have often been seen as turning to homosexuality because they do not have the ability secure heterosexual relationships. Lesbians are commonly believe to have simply been too unattractive to men, thus forcing them to be with other women. This is just your standard homophobia presented in a woke way. It also reveals the common resentment those who come to queerness later in life often have for those who come out when they are young.

    For many people, discovering that they are gay in a homophobic culture is not “good fortune”, as he condescendingly scare quoted. It is actually something that separates you so much from society that many queer people never really feel at home until they finally meet other queer people who feel just like them. I remember the early days of recognizing that I was a trans woman and that I only dated men. It was an incredibly isolating time and it’s why I’ve become a community organizer in Los Angeles. As a gender queer child, I hungered for queer community, and I was very thankful to find it online. Yet while the internet may have given me a place to socialize with others, it also presented an amalgamation of ideas that were less relevant once I started forming community with queer and trans people. I point out Ty’s observation of lesbians being superficial because in a culture that is homophobic, of course he is going to be presented with less than flattering content about the only sexuality that excludes men. And of course, as a man, he’s going to feel a certain way about that. Pretending to be a neutral third party is quite silly. It’s clear to me that when he criticizes lesbians for rejecting bisexual women, or trans women, he’s doing that to support the women in his life, whom he cares for and I don’t think the desire to do this is inherently bad, but I do not think the reaction he has to “gold star identities” is totally disconnected from a history of Lesbophobia being normalized. Even in the very fact that he feels compelled to publish content criticizing a lesbian for who they date at all really seems off to me. And how he has chosen to to respond to criticism is very telling.

    Ty is currently threatening to sue me for some of the content I made responding to his content where I cut through the bullshit and acknowledge the rape-y undertones of his content about gold star lesbians. I feel how I do about this because I know that in a room full of 100 lesbians, there are probably 4 of them that identify as gold star and one of them is probably trans. Of those 4, maybe one of them excludes trans women and is repulsed by women who’ve slept with men, but that also means that she now has very few women in that room who will ever fit her preferences. So functionally, he’s turning to that one woman and calling her a bigot for never sleeping with a man and being proud of it…and that just seems completely pointless to me. Ty seems to believe that lesbians need a man to tell them they are bigoted for not being with men, and only wanting to be with women who’ve been with other women, and he has devoted several videos to this topic. Looking up his name, he has made tons of content specifically about lesbians and he seems very determined to frame what is functionally an extreme minority within the smallest community of the acronym as toxic to the entire community.

    People feel a lot of things when a woman calls herself a lesbian, and what I think is more true than there being a large group of “TERF” lesbians who think they’re better than everyone else because they’ve only slept with women, is that many people feel a certain way when a woman sticks to her guns about not being with men. Ty’s content should start from a foundation of understanding that lesbian are uniquely oppressed in a misogynistic culture that has historically rewarded them for being with men. With that understanding, you recognize the actual proportionality of this conversation. Ty does not understand that our culture is one where lesbians ARE sexually assaulted once they assert that they have only been with women and only want to be with women. He should have some self awareness around this if he is going to create content about bias as a white man.

    The Dapper Delinquent benefits from the white supremacist patriarchal system that upholds gender essentialism. There is a reason he feels so comfortable having an opinion about who lesbians fuck. Personally, as a non-lesbian, this doesn’t feel like my business. Perhaps it is because I am a black trans woman, but I feel like as an outsider, it is not my job to dictate to anyone who they can and cannot date and sleep with. I am making this post because I am a person who feels very defensive of lesbians, and I’ve spent probably most of my life at this point in community with lesbians. I am not getting my understanding of lesbians from the media or from my comment section. I am often the token heterosexual in most of my friend groups and I kinda prefer it that way. Lesbians have always been my biggest ally. So it is very hard for me to listen to what Ty says and not immediately clock that much of what he’s saying is being said because he clearly does not know very many lesbians, but clearly feels for the women who he’s involved with who have been rejected by lesbians. This is not the first series of videos he’s made criticizing lesbians for being lesbian and desiring relationships with other lesbians. When you couple that with his comments about trusting someone’s sexuality label once they’ve “tried it”, it’s not very hard to see why some lesbians read his content as a promotion of corrective rape.

    The thing is, I actually do believe that Ty doesn’t intend for the content to be taken this way, but to my point, he likely doesn’t understand this because he is not in community with lesbians. What I’m saying in this post is the result of my many years of knowing and humanizing lesbians within my own life. Ty clearly does not understand the actual depth of just how much women are pressured to be with men and why a lesbian would be proud of never being with one. Sure, if a lesbian puts someone down for being with a man, that may deserve some criticism, but to my point about proportion, this is an extreme minority within an extreme minority within an extreme minority. It is quite dangerous to present that and then conflate all of these separate things into the term used to describe women who’ve never been with men. Being gold star is not the same as being les4les and neither reject trans women by default and neither represent a large enough amount of lesbians to be presented as “a distinct detriment to the queer community”. It’s literally 4 people who tend to stay home anyways.

    Placing this massive weight of blame on the feet of lesbians is very classic Lesbophobia and I do not feel bad at all for calling it out and for pointing out the sex pest subtext of many of these videos. When you accept that a woman’s body is her own and that her sex life is not about anything other than who she personally wants to have sex with, you feel uncomfortable forming such a deep opinion about who they have sex with and who they reject. In so many of these conversations, people try to suggest that I would feel bad about being rejected for my inherent qualities…and I am. It’s the commonality of my experience that makes me feel very differently about rejection than it seems many white bisexuals feel about rejection.

    I feel for the bisexuals and the trans women who’ve been rejected by people because of who they are. However, I have noticed that many of them take this rejection and twist it into resentment for lesbians. It registers to me that much of this relates to online dating and discourses that were had virtually where people often conclude that lesbians are closed minded because of how they’ve rejected certain individuals. What’s sad to me about this is that offline, the lesbian community is not without its flaws, but is hardly exclusionary towards bisexuals and trans folks. Frankly, there is a part of me that has a hard time not seeing how men who insert themselves in these conversations seem to often do so to signal that they are a safer option. I worry about how that will likely isolate young sapphics from the community because they assume it is exclusionary and thus do not think they’ll be able to find community. The reality is, if you go into these spaces with an assumption of it being bigoted towards you, that will become a self fulfilling prophecy. Sapphic spaces are full of bisexual women and trans women!

    A few weeks ago, I went to the Virgil on a random night for a house music event. On the other side of the bar was a much more poppin, much more well attended sapphic party called IrL World. I met this gorgeous black lesbian who was looking for other black women and slowly we gathered them all, with myself being the token straight girl, as usual. We met each other, we witnessed each other and some of them even kissed. The room was full of a wide range of gender expression and one of the black women was actually there with a girlfriend of hers that is transgender. And that trans woman wasn’t the only one. I’ll be honest, lowkey I was surprised by how many trans woman I met at and saw at event. It would blow the mind of every outsider who assumes that sapphic events are a bunch of cis women with a clearly defined gender identity and expression. most of the women I met were lesbians but not all of them were. Bisexual women were not uncommon.

    I do not think Ty’s reaction to lesbians who date lesbians and gold star lesbians is disconnected from the general negative response lesbians receive when they share share they are only attracted to men. Knowing how rare gold star lesbians are makes it obvious to me that this is misplaced frustration for lesbians being lesbians, not a justified resentment because of lesbians being biphobic or transphobic. This keeps coming back to a baseline resentment towards women for not being with men. There is literally no justification for policing a lesbian’s sexuality and Ty should be self aware enough to understand why the sheer amount of content he’s made about lesbians can be interpreted. I have no emotions at all about lesbians choosing to be with other lesbians or celebrating the fact that they have a never been with men. Even if they thought they were better than everyone else for it, that still wouldn’t make them an oppressor men or bisexuals. At the core of this is the idea that denial of sexual access is in some way oppressive, and I do not think that is a subtext formed independent of the misogyny that justifies the premise of homophobia.

    So what if a lesbian withdraws her interest once she learns a woman she’s courting is also dating a man? So what if a cis lesbian doesn’t want to sleep with trans women? Pretending that is the most oppressive thing in the LGBT community is why people are reading these videos as a foundation for corrective rape. Because ultimately…where else does this go? What does the lesbian who after years of being told to be with men, who knows she only wants to be with a lesbian do with the information that she’s bigoted for understanding who she wants to date? If she said she was bisexual, Ty would celebrate her, especially if she’d actually tried to be with a man. If she said she was queer, and not a lesbian, Ty could celebrate her. If she slept with trans women, as a sexual experiment, Ty would celebrate her. But why does Ty’s opinion even matter? Why does a man’s opinion about lesbians in a culture where lesbians are suppressed matter more than what lesbians say about themselves? Why isn’t a lesbian allowed to deny anyone she wants for any reason she wants? It is wild to me that people just cannot imagine that a lesbian is allowed to say no.

    Ty is victimizing himself currently on his platforms, but it’s quite important that he is reminded that as a bisexual man, he holds systemic power and the ability to oppress lesbians. For that reason, I do hope he reconsiders his desire to host these conversations. He is largely taking what are incredibly rare experiences to essentially make grander statements about lesbians, in defense of bi women and trans women. But his sheer anger towards me for speaking up for lesbians really says a lot. He doesn’t like when anyone stands up for lesbians, and he doesn’t even understand that the lesbians he is attacking currently do foil his preconceived notions about gold star lesbians.

    It should be acknowledged that he insists upon reaching certain conclusions about lesbians without really listening to them or speaking with them. He remains completely apathetic towards their actual lived realities. Instead, lesbians exist as a rhetorical tool. As bullies who’ve denied men, for whom he naturally associates with transgender women. A man who understands the basis of misogyny, would not so easily criticize the sex lives of oppressed women, especially as a white man. I think at the end of the day, this is another example of me being able to see through a performatively woke person who is able to pass as woke because society views him as inherently more trust worthy because he is a white man. These people always hate actually engaging with the subjects of their criticism. He does not want to hear that gold star doesn’t mean what he thinks it means from lesbians or their allies. He is currently threatening to take me to court and have me incarcerated during a time where trans women are experiencing a genocide and people are being placed into concentration camps. All over women who’ve never slept with men. That should truly disturb his audience.

  • Reader Response: Male Doms Fetishizing Transgender Men in the BDSM Scene.

    Recently, we’ve had a few discussions about fetishism and how it impacts transgender women who predominantly date men. However, this reader had a question for me about transgender men and their experience with fetishism!  

    Dear Reader,

    Firstly, I appreciate that you’ve reached out to me for my perspective, but of course I have to begin by stating that I am a transgender woman, and most of my observations of trans men within the BDSM scene are from my own interactions and often the interactions I’ve had with their partners who occasionally desire a connection with me. So, my sample size is small, but I can share some of my observations, and I’ll preface them with the warning that they have been unflattering.  

    In your message, you do not specify that you’ve been engaging primarily with heterosexual men, but I’m going to read between the lines and assume that most of the men who approach you as a feminine transgender man likely identify as heterosexual, and I think that will end up being the source of most of your frustration within the BDSM scene. Kink evangelists will tell you that the BDSM scene has a higher concentration of men who’ve done “the work.” While I think this may be partially true in comparison to most spaces, I have to be frank and say that it’s taken me much longer to accept that, in reality, most of my issues with men can be boiled down to patriarchy and misogyny. it is optimistic to believe that a man who wants to exert sexualized violence has not in some way internalized dangerously patriarchal thought; and the basis of that is gender essentialism.

    Gender Essentialism in the BDSM Scene

    The BDSM community is full of queer and trans people, but that does not mean gender essentialism is not a problem. Gender essentialism is the idea that a person’s qualities are dictated by the sex they were assigned at birth. For those who believe it, that is a destiny that is impossible to escape. In the scene, you’ll see this in the form of Doms (male dominants) not taking Dommes (female dominants) seriously. While plenty of people switch, the assumption often made of those designated female at birth is that they are inherently submissive, and if they ever switch or indicate otherwise, there are people who still believe that they are “truly” submissive because they are female. This is something that even some of the most “woke” people within the scene tend to believe. Whether it’s belittling a Domme’s competence or assuming that a feminine person designated female at birth is a sub, these assumptions can be quite alienating, especially if you are transgender.

    Feminine people tend to be stereotyped as submissive, and if you’re a woman of color, you may be read as more masculine because white supremacy tends to see femininity through an incredibly narrow lens. I am not dominant, and I have never topped a man sexually or kink-wise. However, because I am a tall, Black transgender woman, people will occasionally read me as masculine, and thus dominant. If I were to call them out for this, they’d likely deny it. Often people within the kink scene want to seem as if they are more inclusive than they truly are, but when you are on the receiving end of this, it becomes hard to ignore.

    Despite not being a Domme, I kept experiencing people not only telling me that I looked like one, but eagerly telling me that I’d be excellent at it, mostly because they liked how I looked and felt it leaned in a more dominant direction. This read of me is incredibly alienating, and it’s why I stopped going to the BDSM dungeons. Frankly, it wasn’t until I lost 70lbs and people started reading me as more feminine because I was smaller that I found fewer people read me as a Domme. At a certain point, this becomes toxic, and I do think it’s important to walk away from spaces and places that don’t seem to see you.

    I think the kink community can be incredibly shallow, and if you’re primarily a person who plays with heterosexual men, you are quite unlikely to find a man who is willing to play with you who “gets it” enough to understand that trans men can be feminine and that doesn’t make them women. Having connected with several male Dominants who have trans men as partners, I’ve certainly noticed a pattern.

    My Observations of Cis Men and Trans Men in The Scene

    Being polyamorous and openly trans means that I often end up dating people who are dating other trans people. On more than a few occasions, I’ve dated men within the kink scene who had partners who were transgender men. I’m not going to say it’s impossible for someone to be attracted to both trans men and trans women, but what I notice from most of these men is that they are almost never interested in cis men, and typically identify as straight. If they don’t, it’s still pretty rare that they have been with men. I’ve had a lot of conversations with ostensibly “straight” men who say their partner “made them gay” because they were a feminine, non-transitioning trans masc or non-binary person. Quite often, these men will misgender their partners when they are not around, and more than just a few of them have confided with me that they miss their partner’s femininity the further that person medically transitions. Frequently, none of this is perceptible to the trans masc or non-binary person, who often conflates the heterosexual man’s attention with validation and allyship. They are often just happy to be with a man and don’t see how little that man actually cares for them. They are often interested in dating me because they would like access to a feminine partner, and I do not date submissive men.

    When I first moved to LA, I dated a liberal lawyer for a very brief time. He was quite handsome. If you were to go to his partner’s social media page, he’s celebrating his growth as a trans man with what is presumably an affirming partner and crowdfunding his top surgery. However, when he was with me, I noticed how often he used “she/her” when referring to him, and he privately confided that he isn’t looking forward to his partner’s top surgery. The two clearly got along quite well and, to my understanding, are still very much together. They’re a very cute couple, but I’ve observed many couples like this in the past, and often when I date these men, they are dating me because they miss femininity.

    Within the BDSM scene, I’ve noticed an uptick in patriarchal Doms shifting themselves to seem safer to people who are designated female at birth, but do not identify as women. People whom I’ve observed mistreat women shift their presentation and change their labels, often around the time they are called out. When I first came to the scene, I was bottoming for a woke Dom who definitely tokenized me as a plus-sized black transgender woman with a bit of clout within the scene. Through the years, I saw this person move just like your standard patriarchal Dom, but the labels made them seem safer. It’s not that I don’t think their identity is real; it’s just that if someone were to look at their identity and assume they are safe because of it, they’d be very wrong, based on what I know. People do change, but these were always people who I -heard- speak at length about their desire to be with men, but when they met me, I kinda ended up calling their bluff.

    Passing has many upsides, but a major downside is that you end up in situations where woke people have to wrestle with their ignorance directly in front of you. I’ve been rejected by most of the “pansexual” Doms I’ve been approached by right after I share with them that I am transgender. My experiences helped me understand the depth of gender essentialism within the BDSM scene and the phony nature of a lot of “woke” Doms. Keep in mind, these aren’t sexual partners; these are people who are doing BDSM with me, usually impact play. But even for the woke pansexual Dom, a line is drawn in the sand for those designated male at birth. With that Dom, what I had to accept was that because I was designated male at birth, no matter how many scenes we did or how much power exchange we’ve done, there was never going to be a moment where they shifted and desired something more intimate with me. And sometimes this has been very hard for me to accept because I’d be bottoming for a man who topped cis women, and I’d see how the aftercare they gave me was more passive, less intimate, and never sexual. To the point where sex and kink were something I stopped anticipating because gender essentialism often dictated that it was entirely off the table. They were comfortable hitting me, but they’d never desire me how they desired a person designated female at birth; because of their parts. And that was dizzying for me, because they would never flat out just say that, but would continue to present as if they were always open; even more so than straight men.

    I say all that to say that I think you’re always going to be in a conundrum when it comes to attempting to form a kink relationship with a cis het man, so I think if you want to avoid binarist relationships, your best bet is to avoid them. For many people, gender is part of their BDSM practice. I’d say it isn’t part of mine, but because I only play with men, that’s hard for me to deny. However, what I’ve come to realize is that this can have many nuances and some of them are alienating to transgender people.

    I’ve known a  decent amount of transgender men who enjoy taking on a feminine persona when they play, and in the vanilla world, there are already men who fetishize the idea of taking a person who is designated female at birth, who isn’t gender conforming, and pressuring them to gender conform. There are indeed men who fetishize transgender men because they imagine that there’s something about them that will get the trans man to relinquish their gender and service their specific desires. Many men fetishize Lesbians and view all gender non conforming people assigned female as stand ins for them. “Dyke/Butch breaking” is a massive fetish and many straight men imagine they will be the exception. As I said, you’re incredibly optimistic if you think cis men in the scene haven’t internalized patriarchal abuse. Because BDSM is more than what is represented in BDSM porn, I think it’s silly to pretend it is inherently patriarchal, but I also think we have to be realistic about the fact that very few men have done the work needed to see it as anything other than that.

    Actionable Steps

    I’m not going to pretend that transgender men are incredibly common within the BDSM scene. There are a few transgender men who come to my munch, and they seem very comfortable within the scene. However, I’ve noticed that, romantically, they predominantly have cis women as partners. I don’t think that’s coincidental. The impression I’ve often gotten from straight men within the scene is that they are more invested than they should be in other people’s judgments of them. As I said, the “pansexual” kink scene often ends up just being the heterosexual scene, and for that reason, there are distinctly sapphic or gay kink scenes.

    There are many people who’ve organized gatherings specifically to address the problem of straight men ruining their BDSM experience. I think that if you are a person who finds the gender binary alienating, your best bet will be with other queer people; and yes, you can still play with men if that’s the only type of person you want to play with. I think that in your specific situation, you’re going to really require a series of deep conversations about gender and boundaries, and I think people within the acronym are far more likely to not just understand, but celebrate your queerness.

    Last week, I popped my head into Wicked Zen, a dungeon in the San Gabriel Valley (where I’m from). I was elated to see many trans and queer people, each there, playing, connecting, and having a good time with people who seemed to understand them. Most local dungeons host queer nights or gatherings specifically for the queer community. In my recent post about BDSM events, I shared several communities that I think would be a great start if you’re in the Los Angeles area.

    Ultimately, finding community should be your focus right now. Go to munches, make friends, gain insight into how others navigate the scene. Bind yourself to other submissives so you can communicate and warn each other. I think one of the worst things you can do is rush. Dominants who do not truly care for you will try to push you too quickly. Focus on making friends and building your community. You probably don’t want to hear this, but that’s what you should be doing in your 20s. Don’t let men ruin your relationship with kink when you’re young. You can and will find the people who are on the same page with you. Yes, you may have to accept a smaller dating pool, but it’s a much higher quality one. It’s okay to be someone who isn’t immediately understood, who is a bit of an acquired taste, but be wary of people who’d want you to prove yourself to them, who hold your respect for your identity hostage. Finding the right people takes time, and you’ve still got plenty of time.